Posts from — March 2010

I thought this might interest anyone living or considering purchasing in the 95828 zip code of Sacramento. What do you see? What stands out to you about this trend graph? All sales are based on information provided in Sacramento MLS (single family detached sales only).

I get a lot of questions about FHA / HUD standards and what a property needs to qualify. Here’s the deal: FHA is primarily concerned that everything in a house functions properly and that there are no health and safety issues. FHA continually says, “Soundness, Safety & Security” as their motto. As an FHA certified real estate appraiser, the inspections I do are based upon guidelines from the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD).

I was in the town of Locke a couple weeks ago and I snapped the following shot of a property I happened to pass. Do you think this property would qualify for an FHA loan?

Here is a sample of some of the things I look for while on an FHA inspection:

• Appliances must be in functional use. If there is a hood, it must work. If there is a dishwasher it must work. If there is a stove, it must work…
• The heating unit must be in working order (and AC if applicable)
• Paint must not be chipping, peeling, or flaking on homes built before 1978. There must be no defective paint or exposed wood for properties built after 1978. If there is an issue with paint, it needs to be cured properly by actually scraping the paint instead of just painting over with new paint.
• The water pressure must be adequate for the house. Appraisers flush toilets, turn on all faucets and ensure that both hot and cold water are working.
• The water heater must be in working order.
• The attic must be inspected and we make sure that there are vents, no evidence of a previous fire, no exposed or frayed wires, and that sunlight is not beaming through.
• Attics and crawlspaces are to be viewed at least with head and shoulders into them (if present)
• The crawl space must be inspected and we make sure there is not excessive debris or signs of standing water or any other foundation support issues.
• Electrical outlets must work.
• Toilets must flush and be mounted
• No leaks in the roof.
• The carpet does not have to be perfect (stains or minor tears okay). If there is a health or safety issue with the flooring, then that is a red flag. 
• A house does not need new interior paint.
• Windows cannot be broken. Cracks can be okay so long as there is not an issue with safety, soundness and security.
• No dangling wires from missing fixtures.
• Water heaters must be properly attached with straps (local code says that water heaters need to be strapped and FHA requires water heaters to meet code).
• Stoves are not required unless they are drop in stoves.
• FHA doesn’t require air conditioning, insulation, smoke detectors or the like, but if they are there they must work as they were intended.

The photo above clearly demonstrates there might be a safety issue with the structure. It doesn’t look very sound, does it? Do you see any other violations of HUD minimum standards?

This type of knowledge is vital for first-time buyers, sellers and investors especially. Please let me know if you have any questions. I am glad to help buyers, agents, investors, brokers and anyone else know more about FHA standards and the appraisal process. FHA loans have really dominated the market in the Sacramento Region, so it’s important to be aware of potential issues that might make or break a deal. You can reach me at 916-595-3735 or ryan@lundquistcompany.com.

Builders were really cranking out houses throughout the Sacramento Region during the housing boom a few years back. I remember 5+ years ago going to virtually any builder website and seeing pockets of projects they had going on from Merced County to Sutter County. The market was hot, profit was ripe, and prices were high too.

I happened to be on Beazer’s website today and I noticed they only have one project right now in the Sacramento Region (Capital Village - as shown below). Times certainly have changed, haven’t they? I know, I know, this is not great news. So let me give you something uplifting to end on. If you are feeling discouraged about life and the housing market, give local real estate broker Keith Klassens’s recent post a read.

A local realtor named Jesse Garcia of Keller Williams Realty interviewed me last week and the video is live today. We talked about the real estate market in Sacramento, property values, property tax appeals, and Project 680. Jesse is a good guy and I feel honored for the opportunity to chat a bit in his “Information You can Use” blog series. You can view more videos in Jesse’s series on his YouTube channel or on The Sacramento Real Estate Tube. Anyway, check it out and let me know what you think.

I took a few hours off today to head to Clarksburg with my wife to fit in a little anniversary date. We enjoyed a scenic drive through several Sacramento Delta towns, a light lunch, a short visit to the town of Locke, and some wine-tasting. In all the times I’ve appraised property in the Delta area, I’ve actually never stopped to eat, so I was delighted to enjoy The Dinky Diner. This little mobile set-up (as pictured below) is located on top of the levy about one mile south of Old Sugar Mill along South River Road. We were impressed with the burgers, the small town feel, and the great vibe as we sat outside on a park bench overlooking the Delta. What a fantastic little joint.

Looking at the sales history of a property can be very telling. In fact, you can often get clues into the happenings of the real estate market. Here is an interesting sales history for a Sacramento fourplex I came across in the course of a current appraisal I’m working on. This is not at all atypical because the market for residential-income properties really boomed in Sacramento (and then it fell hard too).

7/25/2000 – $110,000 sale
7/16/2002 – $278,000 sale
8/18/2004 – $435,000 sale
2/10/2005 – $459,000 sale
9/08/2008 – $377,500 sale  (maybe a short sale – did not list in MLS)
5/01/2009 – $104,250 (transfer to bank – foreclosure)
7/13/2009 – $140,000 sale

What do you see? Does anything stand out to you? Let me know if you have any questions about the local real estate market or your neighborhoood. One of the things I enjoy most about my job is that I get to talk with local home owners and real estate agents about important decisions they are making.

I took some audio a while back of the sound of a train while on an appraisal inspection. While standing in the backyard of a property, I made the recording below. Do you think this would be a big deal for buyers? Listen to the video HERE if you cannot see it in your RSS or email subscription.

In appraisal terminology, this sound would be categorized as “external obsolescence” because it’s something external to the property that imposes on the property. One ineresting thing to me about external obsolescence is that there is a different reaction in the marketplace to locational challenges depending upon the market. For example, in a market with high demand and low supply (with increasing property values), you’ll find that many buyers will tend to overlook certain location and/or condition issues, whether close proximity to an airport, train tracks, fire station, etc… But in a downward market with less demand and a greater supply, buyers will tend to be picky and pay less for properties with locational issues. So if you are selling your property, know your market well and then set the price accordingly.

I’d love to hear your thoughts or stories about homes with external issues like this. Have you ever purchased or sold a house with a locational challenge? What’s it like to live by such a location? Do you tune it out after a while or does it gnaw at you day after day?

One other thing to consider too is that often times properties with locational challenges are not assessed properly because the Assessor’s mass appraisal process may not really capture negative features of a property that might make it worth less (backing to commercial, next to a gas station, located on a busy street). If you have any appraisal questions or needs due to location, please contact me at 916-595-3735.

Language is important. The way we describe things can evoke certain emotions and reactions, so we must choose our words carefully. This is true in all aspects of life, and definitely true in real estate. I always smile when I see the ways agents attempt to not say “bank-owned” or “REO” or “Foreclosure” in listings. I suppose if potential buyers would be put off by “FORECLOSURE”, then by all means, use a different word or phrase. In place of “bank-owned” I’ve seen “corporate-owned” or “owned by the mortgage company” or “lender-owned” or “liquidation sale”.

If you were in the market to purchase a property, would it matter to you whether something was labeled as “corporate-owned” or “foreclosure”? Is there any stigma in your mind for a home that is selling as bank-owned?

EDD finally posted January 2010 unemployment rates. They typically get new data on their website about 20 days into the next month (for the previous month), but this time around they took quite a bit longer. Maybe they didn’t want to release discouraging numbers (just kidding). Actually, they have a new schedule posted HERE in case you’re interested.

The graph to the right was taken from the EDD website. It looks like California is not doing too well compared with the rest of the United States. When looking at the graph or the data below, what stands out to you? Does anything surprise you? In Sacramento County, Gold River has the lowest unemployment rate at 2.6% and Walnut Grove takes home the top rate at 30.5%. These two have actually been bookends on the unemployment rate spectrum for quite some time. Overall Sacramento County has an unemployment rate of 13.10% as of January 2010.

What strikes you about the information above? How do you think unemployment influences the real estate market?

I had a local Realtor interview me today on video about the real estate market in Sacramento, HVCC, tax appeals, and a ton of other stuff. His video will go live next week, and I’m excited for that. That’s not really the point of this post though. I mention this because on my drive home from my video conversation, I found myself thinking about market value, low appraisals and an essay written by Patrick Egger (HERE – pdf). Here is an off-the-cuff unscripted podcast (as you’ll notice I mix up 282 and 283): 

I’m very excited to announce Project 680′s upcoming “Biking for Socks” event on May 8, 2010. We are doing a community bike ride in order to accomplish three things: 1) Bring awareness to the problem of student homelessness in the FCUSD; 2) Collect socks for homeless kids in the FCUSD; and 3) Gather up a few bucks to be able to give to the District Liaison for Homeless Services so she can meet the needs of students on an “as needed” basis – meaning that when the neediest of students come to her, she can simply take care of some of the things they need – whether clothing, deodarant, shoes, study materials, etc….

Please have a look at the video below and let me know if you have any questions, ideas, or a desire to get involved in any way. Click HERE if you don’t see the video in your RSS or email subscription. Also, you can sign up for the event on Facebook HERE.

I hit the jackpot yesterday when talking with a local realtor, and it ended up being a “two birds with one stone” situation. Here’s what happened.

Earlier in the day I emailed a Facebook Realtor friend and asked her if she ever sold a condo in a particular subdivision in the city of Folsom. There are ZERO recent condo sales in this subdivision in Empire Ranch, so I want to get as much firsthand information as possible. Well, my friend gave me a chunk of insight, but it turned out that she needed some help because she was having financing issues with one of her deals in the “Rivage” condo subdivision in Folsom.

Anyway, through the course of contacting listing agents for research for my appraisal, I talked with Realtor Ann Boswell of Insight Real Estate. I had never spoken with Ann before, but she ended up being a wealth of information for not only the subject subdivision, but for “Rivage” up the street. Ann spent a good 10-15 minutes on the phone with me (I love when Realtors take time like that. It’s good on so many levels). 

It turns out that since Rivage has not yet completed construction, some of the buildings are FHA approved and others are not. That could be an issue, don’t you think? It’s funny to think that despite these buildings being next door to each other in the same new development, some of them don’t make the cut (yet) to be guaranteed by HUD. More specifically, per HUD’s website, only buildings 1 and 13-26 are currently approved by HUD/FHA.

Two birds with one stone? One, I got insight into the subject subdivision. And Two, thanks to Ann Boswell I was able to resource my Facebook friend with information on Rivage and why her deal was maybe having some issues. But most of all, I was able to give my Facebook friend the name of someone at Wells Fargo who could help her get her condo on the HUD approved list.

You can search HERE to see the HUD/FHA approved condominium list.