Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

Home Appraiser

The players in the market & normal pendings

By 17 Comments

Who are the players in the market? Who is buying and selling? Who is coming? Who is going? These are questions we have to ask to grasp a local market. And for real estate professionals, knowing who the players are helps us serve clients well and sometimes even make future business plans. 

Well, let’s talk about a new player in town called Opendoor. This company is trying to gain a foothold in about 20 markets across the country right now. If you’re not local, are they in your area?

Opendoor posted up in Sacramento last year and they’ve begun to make a splash. They’re not dominating the market by any stretch, but in the region over the past few months they bought over 90 homes. I don’t fully understand the fine print of their business model yet, but in a nutshell they buy from owners privately and then put these homes back on the market to sell to the public. In fact, mostly all of their private purchases are currently re-listed on our local MLS. Opendoor also has an affiliation with Lennar – a local builder.

My real estate antennas: Any time I see a group buying a larger amount of homes, I pay attention. In the past I talked heavily about Blackstone, and in the future I’ll discuss other players whether they’re making a splash or shaping the market (like Blackstone did). Any stories or thoughts?

Now for those interested, let’s talk about the market – especially pendings.

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

—–——– Big local monthly market update (long on purpose) —–——–

The market slumped during the second half of 2018, and now it’s an interesting spot. Let’s talk about it.

THE SHORT VERSION:

  • Pendings were normal for January
  • Sales volume has slumped for 8 months in a row
  • Prices are barely up from last year
  • Most metrics softened as expected for January
  • The market is starting to wake up for the spring
  • This post is long on purpose. Skim or pour a cup of coffee.

DOWNLOAD 70+ graphs: Please download all graphs here as a zip file. See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

THE LONGER VERSION:

Here’s some of the bigger topics to consider right now.

We need time: We don’t have a totally clear picture for where the market is going yet in 2019. We still need more time. Here is what I am specifically looking for in the stats over these next few months.

Normal pendings: It’s big news that pending sales were normal this past month compared to last January. We’ve had a slump in sales volume for eight months, so what does this mean? Well, it could be the market trying to find some normalcy after two quarters of sluggishness. Though the real cause very likely stems from mortgage rates recently declining. It’s amazing how that can affect buyers and even sales volume. Remember, pendings in January will likely close in February and especially March. So if we start to see a normal level of pendings in January and February, we may see sales volume show normalcy for the time being.

Yeah, most metrics softened: We saw the typical signs we’d expect to see at this time of year with most metrics. It look longer to sell last month, prices dipped, inventory increased, and sales volume sloughed. Though overall the softening in most metrics felt way more pronounced.

Low rates are steroids: Mortgage rates declined and that’s seeming to draw some buyers back into the market. Low rates are like steroids for demand – at least temporarily.

More listings this year: There’s more listings this year compared to last year at the same time. In fact, it’s been about five years since we’ve started the year with this much housing supply.

Waking up: I’m hearing from many agents about more buyer attention on their listings lately. More traffic at open houses. More offers. It’s still to be determined what this spring market will look like exactly, but for now the spring season is starting to move.

Not seeing aggressive price gains: The rate of price change has slowed. What I mean is in years past we’d see 7-10% price increases when running stats, but now we’re seeing modest 2-3% year-over-year price gains. 

In case you need slumping trivia to impress friends: Last month we saw the worst sales volume in 11 years for a January. We’ve had eight months in a row of year-over-year sales volume declines. That’s a dismal stat and there’s no sugar-coating it. If this trend doesn’t change we’re going to have a much different market. Yet this is why seeing normal pendings for January is a big deal because today’s level of pendings could presumably show a normal number of sales in a couple of months when these properties close.

The Tallest Graph in Sacramento: Here’s a look at over 60,000 single family detached sales in Sacramento County. This graph is inspired by Jonathan Miller.

Less offers: Here’s an interesting way to see the market has slowed. Multiple offers are down about 11% this year.

More concessions in new construction: Lots of builders are offering credits and concessions to help get their deals done lately. This is a symptom of a slower market. It seems more sellers are also offering concessions and credits too. Buyers, don’t be afraid to negotiate with sellers since the market has slowed, but at the same time don’t think you are driving the market either. Keep your perception of power in check. And sellers, talk with your agent about whether credits or concessions might need to be an option on the table.

Final thought before the graphs: In closing, the market is in an interesting spot. It feels like it’s juggling uncertainty from last year with a striving for normalcy today. We only have one month of data and we need to keep watching to see how this market is going to emerge.

I could write more, but let’s get visual instead.

BIG ISSUES TO WATCH:

1) SLOWING MOMENTUM: The stats show the market is slowing down when we look at the rate of change by year. Looking at monthly, quarterly, and annual numbers helps give a balanced view of things.

2) SALES VOLUME SLUMP: It’s important to look at sales volume in a few ways to get the bigger picture. Here it is by month and year.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY:

Key Stats:

  • January volume down 21.5%
  • Volume is down 4.7% over the past 12 months

SACRAMENTO REGION:

Key Stats:

  • January volume down 17.7%
  • Volume is down 5.8% over the past 12 months

PLACER COUNTY:

Key Stats:

  • January volume down 10.9%
  • Volume is down 7.7% over the past 12 months

3) LAST YEAR VS THIS YEAR: Here’s a comparison of last year compared to the same time this year. What do you see?

NOTE: Placer County had very few sales this January, so I wouldn’t put much weight on the price figures for this month.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY (more graphs here):

 

SACRAMENTO REGION (more graphs here):

PLACER COUNTY (more graphs here):

I hope that was helpful.

DOWNLOAD 70+ graphs: Please download all graphs here as a zip file. See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

BLOG BASH: Just a reminder I’m hosting a blog party on March 2nd from 3-7pm. You’re invited to celebrate my blog’s 10th birthday. I know, that sounds a little cheesy. But I’ll be buying the first 100 beers… Details here.

Questions: Any stories to share about who is playing the market right now? What are you experiencing right now in the trenches with buyers and sellers?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Being neutral, price per square foot, and the Governor’s new digs

By 34 Comments

I have a few things on my mind. Let’s talk about me being asked to recruit for a brokerage (really), price per sq ft, and the Governor’s new digs.

1) WHY I SAID “NO”:

A brokerage recently asked me if I would help them recruit agents. The idea was I could use my influence to attract agents to a certain brand and then get a commission for each person I recruited.

I said NO, and my answer will always be NO. I probably don’t even need to mention this, but I want to communicate clearly. As an appraiser I won’t take sides. I’m neutral in my work, but my independence also extends in the way I interact with the real estate community. This is why you’ll see me speaking in many different places and real estate offices. I’m here to educate, not advocate. The truth is if I said yes I would’ve instantly destroyed my credibility.

2) PRICE PER SQ FT:

Here’s a look at price per sq ft trends in a few local areas. I plan to share more graphs like this throughout the year if people like them. Does anyone want to see a video tutorial for how to make these? Let me know. What do you see?

Two Takeaways:

1) RANGE: There’s always a price per sq ft range, which means there’s never just one price per sq ft figure that applies to every property in a neighborhood. Sellers often want to hijack a price per sq ft figure from a sale down the street, but that’s one of the quickest ways to overprice. My advice? Pay attention to price per sq ft, but most of all ask yourself what the comps are selling for. That’s exactly what appraisers are going to do.

2) OUTLIERS: There are clear outliers. As an FYI, usually the highest price per sq ft figures end up representing the smallest-sized homes or over-the-top unique properties.

3) THE GOVERNOR’S NEW DIGS: 

Gavin Newsom is the new governor of California and he just bought a $3.7M house in Fair Oaks. This price point isn’t much in many areas of the country, but it’s actually the fifth highest residential sale ever in Sacramento County. This home is said to have over 12,000 sq ft and it’s located on 8 acres. It’s near the American River, but not on the river. Now two of the top five sales in the county have a connection to a governor (the other was the mansion Ronald Reagan started to build in Carmichael in the 1970s).

Here’s a picture I took of the front gate this week, and here’s a video from a previous listing if you wish to see the home. Not too shabby, right?

Value thought: In the future we’ll have to consider whether there will be a price premium or not for this home because a governor owned the property.

CLASS I’M TEACHING: I’m teaching my favorite class at SAR called How to Think Like an Appraiser on January 31st from 9-12pm. We’ll dig deep into comps and adjustments (and have some fun). I’d love to have you come out.

I hope this was helpful or interesting.

Questions: Would you pay more if a governor previously owned the home? What do you think of my recruiting story? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

At least read this part of the appraisal

By 15 Comments

I know, nobody actually reads appraisal reports. Well, except for one thing – the value. But let’s talk about a critical place to look in an appraisal that can make all the difference. I have a story to share too about why this even matters.

BONUS: Check out the new new sales volume graphs below.

Look for these boxes: The bottom of page two in the appraisal has a few important boxes the appraiser can check, and these boxes help show if the value is “as is” or if there are required repairs, inspections, or other conditions. My advice? Be sure to look at these boxes carefully as well as any commentary listed in the space below (or the addendum if it says “See Addendum”).

If the value is “as is”, the appraiser is saying the property is worth that amount without any required repairs or further inspections needed.

If a “subject to” box is checked that likely means the value has already taken into consideration certain repairs or that the property will pass a future inspection (maybe a pest inspection, foundation inspection, two-year roof certification, etc…). So if an owner does the repairs listed, it doesn’t increase the value because the value was already based on the repairs being made.

In short, if you see a box checked besides “as is”, that’s a clue there is more to understand about the value.

An example of why this matters: A real estate agent uploaded an appraisal I did into MLS. This appraisal was completed for a lawyer and the value was not “as is”. In fact, this property had extensive damage, but the attorney asked me to value the property as if it was in average condition. This was spelled out blatantly in my report by using the boxes above (and in other places).

The problem here is the selling agent may not have realized the appraisal was not “as is” because the listing said something like, “Appraised at $670,000 in August 2018.” Yet the property was listed for $100,000 less because it was being sold “as is.” So the question becomes, could this be a liability for the agent? What if an out-of-town buyer bought based on thinking he/she was getting a discount because of the attached appraisal? Also, does this expose the appraiser to liability or reputation damage if people are reading the report and not understanding the value isn’t “as is”? I’m not a lawyer, but something doesn’t quite smell right here.

I’m not trying to make a big deal out of this, but sometimes details matter, so I caution real estate friends to look closely at the appraisal to understand the value. By the way, the agent was cool about removing the appraisal when I reached out about this.

The Big Point: Please read the bottom of page two to understand if the value is “as is” or if there are repairs built into the value. That can make all the difference.

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

SALES VOLUME SLUMPING: On a different note, here are some graphs I made yesterday to tell the story of sales volume slumping 11% in the Sacramento Region. I included a graph from 2005 also in case you’re wondering what volume did when the housing market imploded.

Questions: Any stories to share? Do you look at the boxes I mentioned above? When is it okay and not okay to upload appraisals in MLS?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Seven years of price increases & my blue kitchen island

By 16 Comments

Let me get straight to it. I’m excited to share some new visuals. I’m geeking out because these new images help tell a compelling story of seven years of price increases. Whether you’re local or not, I hope you can dig these.

A FEW QUICK THINGS THIS WEEK:

1) Loan Limits: You probably heard conforming loan limits were raised for the third year in a row. This basically helps buyers continue to afford higher prices. I’m not saying that’s bad, but it would be nice if wage growth more than anything was helping people afford the market.

2) Sign the Petition for Appraisers: Last week I wrote about a move to start getting rid of appraisers. This is a big deal with huge implications for the housing market and future escrows. I co-wrote a petition through change.org and I want to ask you to please sign it. SIGN HERE.

3) Cool Graphing Link: On a lighter note, Freddie Mac launched a new graphing tool where you can make quick visuals and even compare different markets throughout the United States. Not every city is listed, but it’s worth checking out and getting lost for a few minutes.

4) My Blue Kitchen: I talked about blue being the rage in kitchens, and I guess my post inspired me. During Thanksgiving break I built a new kitchen island and we painted it blue. Woodworking is definitely a passion and it’s something I do to help keep my sanity. Anyway, this was a fun project and I wanted to share.

SEVEN YEARS ON ONE GRAPH (NEW VISUALS):

Here’s some images for four counties (Sacramento, Placer, Yolo, & El Dorado). What I like is we see price trends for seven years on one graph. It may take a moment to figure out how to digest these images, but look for changes in price and volume over time. So far people who have seen these have noted rising prices and definitely vanishing affordability. Keep in mind they don’t include most of December for 2018, and that could change the look slightly by next month. 

What do you see?

SACRAMENTO COUNTY:

SACRAMENTO REGION:

PLACER COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY:

YOLO COUNTY:


SHARE THESE IMAGES: You are welcome to share any of these images in your newsletter, on social media, or on your blog, etc… See my sharing policy for details and 5 ways to share (please don’t copy my post verbatim).

I hope that was interesting or helpful.

Questions: What do think of these images? Which ones do you like best? Any suggestions for improvement? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.