overpricing

Real estate trends to watch in 2020

January 7, 2020 By Ryan Lundquist 27 Comments

What’s the real estate market going to do in 2020? Let’s talk about some of the bigger emerging trends. Scroll quickly or digest slowly. Anything to add?

Class I’m teaching on Jan 16th: I’m doing a big market update at SAR from 9-10:30am. We’ll talk through where the market is at, tips for talking to clients, and ideas for where to focus business. I’d love to see you there. Sign up here.

TRENDS TO WATCH IN 2020:

Affordability: Buyers are struggling to afford higher prices. Despite positive economic news lately the truth is home price growth has outpaced wage growth and rents have also risen substantially. This means many buyers and renters are having a difficult time with higher prices.

Blue is the color of the year: This year the Pantone color of the year is Classic Blue. Does this mean we’ll see more blue? Maybe. Maybe not. In recent years we’ve already been seeing blue in kitchens especially. No matter what, when looking through home magazines there are many vibrant colors instead of just gray and white.

Sliding sales volume: A byproduct of shrinking affordability is a smaller pool of buyers able to handle higher home prices. This is something to watch and even more important than prices in my opinion. Often we fixate on what prices are doing, but the number of sales happening is the best indicator of the temperature of the market. Are buyers putting their foot on the gas or brakes? Show me the number of sales and I’ll let you know.

Addicted to low rates: We’ve had eight years of historically low rates and we’re now feeling the effects. Prices have risen dramatically, people are staying in their homes longer, and the market feels hyper-sensitive to rate changes. Thus what happens with mortgage rates this year will play a huge role in how the market feels and unfolds. Check out this mortgage rate table from Len Kiefer below (or here). Can you see why 2018 felt so dull? I know it seems crazy that buyers would freak over rates just above 4.5%, but that’s where we’re at (and climbing rates lessens affordability).

Ending single family zoning: There’s a movement to do away with single family zoning in order to help create more housing. In 2019 we saw Minneapolis do this by allowing up to three units to be built on a single family lot, and this is definitely something to watch in many markets across the country. By the way, if you own land, could it become more valuable if zoning changed?

Tech company invasion: It almost feels like there’s a tech bubble because so many companies are trying to get a piece of the real estate pie. On one hand some start-ups are going to fail because their algorithms are designed for labs rather than a relationship-centric real estate market. On the other hand some tech companies are poised to gain market share this year. In Sacramento Opendoor looks to have sold about 1% of transactions last year and they currently own 90 homes. I’m guessing Zillow is aiming for 1-2% of market share this year. Will they be successful? I’ll let you know next year… In all of this it’s good to remember the traditional model represents the vast bulk of the housing market despite the massive attention these companies are getting. Yet we can’t ignore this trend because it’s bound to spur the traditional model to become more efficient.

Overpricing will still be an issue: Price growth has clearly slowed, but sellers still think it’s super hot. This is a glaring issue because sellers tend to think they’re going to get ten offers at any price they choose from very desperate buyers longing for their home. It’s like sellers have shown up at the end of a movie and they have no idea what the movie is about (but they think they do). My advice? Price for the dynamics of the current market rather than a hot market from yesteryear.

Buyers grow even pickier: In 2019 there was a greater sense of hesitancy about the market. Lots of buyers felt leery. Am I buying at the top? Am I going to get stuck if the market changes? What does the future hold? These questions aren’t easy to answer of course until the future actually happens (sorry, but it’s true). The reality is uncertainty is bound to cause buyers to become even more discerning about condition, location, paying the right price and waiting for the right house.

Staying put instead of moving: We have a market of homebodies where nobody is moving. Okay, that’s an overstatement. It was reported recently that homeowners are staying put an average of thirteen years compared to just eight years a decade ago. There’s simply less incentive to sell in light of low mortgage rates and higher prices. Why move if you’re sitting pretty? This of course is one reason why we’re not seeing as many listings.

Checking out of California: Despite some residents staying put, this year there will be lots of Californians moving to all the usual places like Texas, Nevada, Arizona, Oregon, Idaho, etc… For the real estate community, I highly suggest you consider who has incentive to move this year. Remember, a California pension goes a long way in a lower-priced state. Check out a deep piece by CalMatters and you can dig around the U.S. Census Bureau site all day to try to find some data that might be insightful for your business. On a related note, let’s keep an eye on areas plagued with rising fire insurance too as that can unfortunately force migration.

More 1031 Exchanges: We’ll likely see more 1031 Exchanges this year as investors move their money. In my experience there are more in an up market than a down market, and we’re still going up, so be ready. I’ve seen quite a few Bay Area investors park their money in Sacramento, and I’ve seen some Sacramento investors move their money to lower-priced areas. That’s the dream, right? Cash out when prices are higher and buy something better elsewhere.

Consolidation in real estate: Having lower sales volume can be painful for both mortgage companies and real estate offices. Thus we’re likely to see some banks continue to lay people off, mortgage companies will join forces, and some real estate brands and brokerages will need to get creative about staying afloat and trimming the fat with less purchases flowing.

Election year hype: “It’s an election year, so it’s going to be a strong year.” That’s the sentiment we often hear in the real estate community, but an election year isn’t the silver bullet to alter the bigger trend the market is already experiencing. I have a deep blog post coming soon about this.

Flipping seminars: There will be no shortage of celebrity flipping seminars this year to teach the “secrets” of getting rich in real estate.

The narrative of Boomers & Millennials: Be on the lookout for Boomers who need to downsize and Millennials trying to get into the market. We’re bound to see lots of generational conversation this year as Boomers age and Millennials “come to age” so to speak to get into the market. One looming issue that’s been getting more press lately is there is an enormous Boomer population whereas GenX was a smaller generation. Thus at some point it makes us wonder who is going to buy the homes of aging Boomers in years to come. This is something to watch more thoroughly over the next decade. And to make a safe prediction, we’re definitely going to keep seeing “Okay, Boomer” references in articles.

Well, that’s what’s on my mind. I could go on and on, especially about things like fire insurance woes, PG&E, Prop 13 reform, rent control, cannabis laws, etc… But at some point I have to stop.

By the way, click to see 2019 market recap images for a few local counties.

I hope this was helpful or interesting.

Questions: What else do you think will be important in 2020? Did I miss something? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Photoshopping & price per sq ft in real estate

June 4, 2019 By Ryan Lundquist 21 Comments

I have a new way to explain how price per sq ft works in real estate. It’s helpful but maybe a little creepy too. No matter what, we need word pictures in real estate to explain concepts, so let’s chat.

The big idea: Using a price per sq ft figure from a different house is sort of like photoshopping someone else’s body on your own. It just might not fit.

Instagram model vs dad bod: Think about it this way. When we use a price per sq ft figure to price a home it can be like taking an Instagram model’s body and putting it on a dad bod. It just doesn’t belong or fit. The problem is we’ve imposed something entirely different on another thing, and it looks awkward. The same holds true in residential real estate when we hijack a price per sq ft figure from a dissimilar house down the street and use it to price a property. Thus if we’re not careful we can end up pricing a “dad bod” home like it was an Instagram model simply because we priced according to model metrics instead of other dad bod sales… Okay, let’s not take this analogy any further. Do you catch my drift though?

Pick your poison: This example isn’t intended to tackle all aspects of price per sq ft, but only help stir conversation. I actually use Starbucks cups and Lamborghinis too, but that’s just me. My advice? Use what works for you.

One more thing. I’m writing as a guy who is currently on a diet, so I’m definitely not poking fun at the reality of dad bods. 🙂

I hope this was helpful (and not too creepy).

Is Blackstone selling? I see Invitation Homes (Blackstone) has a handful of properties listed on the market right now. These could be non-performing assets of course, but we have to ask if they are starting to sell off some inventory too. Stay tuned.

Sign giveaway: Last week I wrote about people who are leaving the market, and I’m giving away the shabby chic signs I made on this Facebook post.

Video: Here’s a video I made to talk through the danger of abusing price per sq ft. Enjoy if you wish. It’s about six minutes.

Question: Does this example work? How do you explain how price per sq ft works in real estate? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Teardowns, lot splits, & highest and best use

August 1, 2018 By Ryan Lundquist 11 Comments

A few weeks ago I took a vacation. And like many working in real estate, my mind doesn’t quite shut off all the way – at least at first. So I’m constantly thinking about trends and value. Anyway, I knew I had a post in me when spotting this.

Teardown: This is Sunset Beach in Southern California. Can you spot the “teardown” house? Yep. It’s the one in the middle. We know this because there are two “McMansion” homes on either side that were built in recent years. Just by this photo alone we get a glimpse into market trends, don’t we?

This vacant lot is a couple blocks away. A house was purchased, razed, and now something big is likely to be built. This is further insight into the market, right?

Highest & best use: Sometimes we don’t think much about highest and best use, but let’s revisit the concept. Highest and best use is that use which is legally permissible, physically and reasonably possible, economically and financially feasible, and which results in the most profitable of the alternatives.

YES: When we look at the house above we can say the highest and best use is very likely for it to be razed and a larger home to be built. Why? Because it’s legal to tear down and rebuild, it’s something that is regularly happening on the street, it’s definitely occurring in the current economy, and we’d see a much higher value for a larger property.

NO: In contrast, if we looked around and nobody was tearing down homes because the city was not allowing it, then the highest and best use couldn’t be building a McMansion because it’s not legally possible. Or if the economy was terrible and building was at a standstill, then we might say it’s not economically feasible to rebuild right now, so the highest and best use might be to keep the house as it is and wait until the economy improves.

A “splitting” example from sellers lately: On a related note I’ve heard a number of sellers lately say things like, “Dude, somebody’s going to buy my lot and split it.” Okay, but is that really the highest and best use for the lot and location? Here’s a few things to think about:

1) Basic truth: Just because it’s technically possible to split a lot doesn’t mean it’s realistic to see that happen at the location or in the current market.

2) Look around: Are people splitting lots in the local market and developing them? Sometimes the proof of value is found in the market just like we see above. It’s not always easy to separate ourselves from what is technically possible and what is actually happening in the market, but we have to do that. If you don’t see anyone splitting lots or building new homes, then your lot might not be a good candidate for a split.

3) Disconnected: Lately I’ve noticed quite a few sellers being disconnected from buyers, so I created this image. My advice? Sellers, be in tune with reasonable prices and also be careful about expecting buyers to do something like a lot split if that’s not realistic for the current market.

Anyway, that’s my quick post inspired by vacation. I hope it was interesting.

Questions: What examples have you seen lately where sellers are disconnected from buyers? Any highest and best use stories too?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

The problem of overpricing in real estate

July 5, 2018 By Ryan Lundquist 15 Comments

Overpricing is a problem. You’d think in such a “hot” market that it wouldn’t be an issue, but it is. I’m not trying to dog sellers, but let’s talk about some of the most common pricing mistakes right now. I hope this helps.

1) Getting married to the list price: Sometimes it’s like sellers get married to a lofty list price and become unwilling to budge – even when buyers are refusing to pay that much. It’s as if sellers get paralyzed and cannot move beyond a clearly unrealistic price. My advice? Listen to the market and budge on price as needed.

2) I need this amount to move: I’ve encountered a few sellers recently who priced based on how much money they needed to move. But the market doesn’t care about personal finances or plans. The market only cares about paying a reasonable price for the property.

3) Headlines: At times sellers hear sensational headlines like, “Values are increasing more rapidly than ever,” so they price according to a headline rather than similar sales in the neighborhood market.

4) Out of touch with picky buyers: Buyers these days tend to be more picky than ever about what they purchase, but I’m not sure sellers are really in tune with how finicky buyers are about price, location, and condition. You’d think buyers would be so desperate to get into contract and pay anything because of a housing shortage, but they’re actually quite patient in many cases because they want to wait for the right property and feel like they’re paying a fair price. My advice? Price for real buyers in the neighborhood market rather than that one mythical “unicorn” buyer who is going to pay more for some reason.

5) Sales instead of comps: The most common pricing mistake I see is pricing according to a sale down the street that really isn’t comparable. So a seller says, “I know that house is totally remodeled with a pool, but someone’s going to pay the same amount for my house.” My advice? Price according to similar homes that are actually getting into contract rather than dissimilar properties. Be careful about hijacking price per sq ft figures too.

6) The fallacy of summer: We hear that summer is the hottest real estate season, but the spring season is actually the hottest in many markets throughout the country. By the time summer rolls around the market is actually beginning to cool because it’s been hot for almost two quarters already. During summer listing volume is just about to peak for the year, and that means it starts to take longer to sell, prices often begin to soften for the season, and buyers gain more power to negotiate. My advice? Be realistic about prices today.

7) Zillow: I can’t tell you how often I’ve heard, “But Zillow says my house is worth X amount.” I know, Zillow says stuff like, “We’re only a starting point and a ballpark figure.” Yet in my experience sellers rely heavily on the Zestimate and very often treat it like a definitive ending point rather than a ballpark. Remember, Zillow doesn’t know anything about condition, upgrades, smell, etc… Sometimes Zillow nails the value, but other times it’s off by a substantial amount – even in a tract neighborhood. My advice? Take “The Big Z” with a grain of salt.

8) Other: What else are you seeing out there?

I hope this was interesting or helpful. In light of the market beginning to cool for the season, I thought scratching out these thoughts might be helpful and even save sellers some money (and heartache).

Questions: Which mistake do you see most often? Any stories or insight to share? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

overpricing

Share:

Share:

Share:

Share: