Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

Sacramento Appraisal Blog

Dude, my house is worth more now, right? Because of that one thing.

By Leave a Comment

My house is worth more now, right? Or maybe it’s worth less because of that one thing? I get questions like this all the time, so here’s some thoughts swirling through my mind. Skim the headings or dig in. Anything to add?

Questions I’ve heard recently:

  • Will prices rise because a nearby restaurant got a Michelin Star?
  • Did my value go up because of the new arena in Downtown Sacramento?
  • My house is worth more because Lady Bird was filmed here, right?
  • Is my house worth more because of that $5M record sale?
  • Would values decline if a new hotel is constructed 1.5 miles away?
  • A new Starbucks down the street makes value go up, right?
  • Will it damage neighborhood values if there’s a cannabis facility nearby?
  • Will a new gas station impact neighborhood prices?
  • Will the Golden State Killer’s house affect my value?
  • Are values going to decline if the school district is taken over by the state?
  • How will adding a casino nearby affect value?
  • Will prices go down if that new teaching hospital happens?

Not a dissertation: Many of these questions are truly complex and they could be research papers. At the same time we read some of these and think, “C’mon man, there’s no way that impacts value.”

Quick truth: We can get so trigger-happy about thinking everything makes a difference for value, but that’s just not the case. It’s like when a home owner says, “Yo, I got a new faucet in the bathroom. How much does this add to value?” Probably nothing. The market just isn’t that sensitive.

My Michelin Star poll: I ran a poll on Twitter after getting a fantastic question about whether Sacramento’s first Michelin Star would be a positive for the surrounding residential neighborhood.

This wasn’t a scientific survey, but it’s interesting to hear what people think. I tend to agree with the majority too. My sense is the Michelin Star will give bragging rights to neighbors, but I’m not sure buyers would truly pay more in an entry-level area to be closer to a top-tier restaurant. Keep in mind if this restaurant did begin to help the commercial market thrive, then maybe that could spill over into the residential market. Otherwise let’s not overthink this.

Generally speaking: If something has little impact on an area, it’s probably not going to affect value much. Let’s remember that when making value claims and thinking through issues. But if something persuades or dissuades buyers, then it could be a big deal for the market. In other words, will people buy or rent for more or less because of the thing? This is the type of market-based thinking we need to consider.

The arena: As an example, the new arena in Downtown Sacramento has been a game-changer because it’s drawn people and other businesses into the city. It’s been a catalyst for development in the immediate market. But that doesn’t mean a buyer ten miles away would pay more for a house because of the new arena. I say fat chance.

Lady Bird: Would someone pay more for a house because the movie Lady Bird was filmed in the neighborhood? I’m not saying the answer is NO, but I just haven’t met a buyer yet who said, “I totally paid more because of Greta Gerwig’s cinematic masterpiece.” Objectively speaking, I can only find four listings that mention the movie too, and that may be telling.

Two takeaways:

1) Let’s be cautious about assigning too much value weight to trivial things that probably don’t influence buyers paying more or less. Does it really mean something for the market? That’s the key.

2) Let’s think critically and be sure to look to data to support our value conclusions. At the end of the day we can make claims about how a certain something impacts the market, but what do stats and data actually show? That’s what matters most.

“Beyond the Bubble” article: I wrote a piece for Comstock’s Magazine this month called Beyond the Bubble. These are things on my mind lately with so much talk about whether we’re in a bubble or not.

Questions: What questions have you been asked lately? Have you seen one type of business or something else impact an entire area? What do you think of any of the questions above? Let’s chat.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Ch-ch-ch-change in neighborhoods

By 8 Comments

Neighborhoods change. Sometimes they end up growing in a positive direction and other times they go downhill in a big way. Today I want to share a quick example of what I mean.

Million Dollar Sales: Here are two images to show million dollar sales in East Sacramento. Prices were definitely rising during both of these time periods, so they’re helpful for comparison. Prices declined during 2007 through 2011, so I didn’t include those years. What do you notice?

Two Observations:

1) More: Today we have more than three times the number of million dollar sales compared with the past cycle. This makes sense because prices in East Sac have generally surpassed where they were prior to the “bubble” bursting. Thus some of the growth is simply because of where prices are at today. 

2) Expansion: The million dollar market used to be concentrated almost exclusively in the Fab 40s and McKinley Park area, but it’s definitely expanded into other places. Over time we’ve seen lots of old homes torn down and rehabbed, and demand for the market has also increased. There is even a newer development called Sutter Park that is already fetching million dollar pending contracts in a location that has previously not seen that price point.

THE BIG TAKEAWAY: As neighborhoods change, so can value. In other words, just because value was one way in the past doesn’t mean it will be the same today. This is why over time we tend to see pockets of value emerge where buyers are willing to pay much than they used to. On the other hand it’s possible to see neighborhood decay where demand wanes and buyers tend to look elsewhere. I’ve written about the four stages of neighborhood life before, so I won’t rehash that much, but it’s so important to stay in tune with how markets are changing. Is the neighborhood growing? Is it stable? Is it in a stage of decay? Are we seeing rebirth? These are all good questions to ask.

Luxury Market Speaking Gig: I’m giving a presentation tomorrow at a luxury market event. I’ll likely share these two images as one of my talking points. Come by the event if you wish (I think you have to register).

What’s the market going to do? I was asked on Norm Shriever’s podcast recently about what the market is going to do in Sacramento over the next few years. In my mind these are some of the bigger points in this conversation.

Questions: What stands out to you about the images above? What sort of change have you seen in markets where buyers are willing to pay more or less? I’d love to hear any stories or examples.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

How much is that new roof & AC unit worth?

By 23 Comments

“I paid $25,000 for a new roof and AC unit. How much is that worth in an appraisal?” I get questions like this all the time and my answer can be frustrating as I say, “It depends.” Here’s my thought process though and why I can’t just rattle off a quick number. Anything to add?

The full amount: A new roof and AC unit are costly, and sellers often want to pass on the full cost to buyers. The idea is, “Hey, I spent twenty five grand, so the buyer is going to reimburse me.” But cost doesn’t always equal value, and it’s not so common for buyers to pay “dollar for dollar” either.

Boring & bling: A roof and AC unit are definitely important, but they’re sort of boring maintenance items instead of bling. What I mean is buyers don’t tend to visit a property and say, “Oh my gosh, did you see that epic new roof? I’m in love.” Nope, they tend to be more impressed with the latest trendy features instead of the age of the roof or AC unit.

Bare minimum: Buyers expect a working roof and AC unit as a minimum. Lenders definitely expect a roof with a minimum of two years of life also. This is why buyers aren’t always willing to pay big bucks for these features because on some level they simply expect them to be adequate already.

Long-term improvements: A roof and AC unit are going to be an advantage for decades, but a buyer might only be in a house for 10 years. So it probably doesn’t make logical sense to pay for the benefit of the entire lifespan of these items in one instance. In other words, the seller has added marathon improvements, but buyers may not pay that during their sprint to purchase.

Location: An AC unit in Antarctica probably isn’t too valuable, so on some level we have to consider location. On a related note, the higher-end of the price market might react differently compared to the lower end of the market. The truth is buyers in some locations or price points are going to be more informed or picky about certain features. Let’s remember energy efficiency can be a factor here too in light of extra savings.

The comps: At the end of the day we have to look to the market for the answers. I tend to consider all the things above, but I also have to be careful not to impose any of my general thinking on the appraisal. Here’s the key. What have buyers been paying for these features? As we look at comps, what seems to be a reasonable amount that buyers would pay? Let’s study comps to begin to get clues about value. 

I know, I didn’t actually answer the question. But that’s not my goal here. My goal is to highlight some important thinking as we try to find the answer.

I hope that was helpful or interesting.

CLASS I’M TEACHING: I’m doing my favorite class at SAR on May 28th from 9am-12pm called “How to Think Like an Appraiser.” Sign up here.

Questions: What point stands out to you the most? Anything to add?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

It might not be an appraiser at the inspection due to new “hybrid” appraisals

By 31 Comments

It’s happening. It might not be an appraiser who shows up for the appraisal inspection. I’ve been talking about the potential of “hybrid” valuations like this, and now they’re here.

The gist is somebody besides the appraiser inspects the property and then gives the inspection details to the appraiser to do the “value part” (without seeing the property). Last week Chris Little, a Realtor friend, was talking to me about his first experience with a non-appraiser inspecting one of his listings, so I asked him some questions.

Ryan: What gave it away that this person wasn’t an appraiser? 

Chris: When he called and asked for an appointment to access the property he identified himself as a property inspector working on the appraisal. I asked if he had a lockbox key (every appraiser I know has one) and he said he did not. We agreed to meet at the property. At the house he gave me his card which said he was a project manager for a company in upstate New York. There was no mention of appraiser on his card.

Ryan: What did the inspector do at the house? Did he measure it?

Chris: He came in and took a bunch of photographs which he said he would upload to their portal so the appraiser could look at them. He went outside and measured the home.

Ryan: What price was this house? 

Chris: The home was listed in the low $800,000’s. The buyers sold their former home and were renting on a short term basis. They were putting down 55% of the purchase price.

Ryan: Did the inspector say he would pass along information you gave?

Chris: Yes, he asked a few questions and said he would include that in his report.

Ryan: What are your concerns about this new process?

Chris: My overarching concern is the validity of the “appraisal.” The buyer was charged less than a traditional appraisal and in my view received less. The proper valuation of a property is essential for many reasons. Inaccurate or incomplete information can effect value and that can effect a transaction, both during the transaction and later on if there is ever a question about value resulting from loss bankruptcy, foreclosure.

Ryan: Anything else to add?

Chris: In my view, this “hybrid” appraisal is meant to streamline the lending process yet puts homeowners and lenders at risk. I don’t think there is a lender out there who would use a discount Cardiologist or Oncologist if they had heart problems or cancer. Why would you underwrite a loan based on an unlicensed individual snapping pictures and taking measurements? One thing that particularly concerned me about the house in question was at almost 4,900 square feet it was more than twice as large as any other home so developing comps would take someone with real knowledge of the market to develop the appropriate value. This unusual Sacramento home doesn’t seem like a good fit for a watered-down process like this.

Ryan: Thanks so much for your time Chris. 

Now a few quick things.

MY CLOSING THOUGHTS:

1) This is a move that diminishes the role appraisers play in the housing market for the sake of so-called convenience. Banks are saying, “Don’t worry. Trust us. It’s all good…” While there is a place for big data in real estate, let’s not forget the crucial role appraisers play as a systems of checks and balances. Do we really trust banks to do the right thing?

2) Value isn’t just about size or bedroom and bathroom count. There is so much more an appraiser observes while walking through a house and talking with the agent. To be fair it seems like this would less of an issue on a cookie cutter house, but on something unique it could be a disaster waiting to happen.

3) If the inspector does not have adequate training, there could be a legitimate issue measuring the house accurately (and we know how important that is).

4) Could this become risky for the rest of the market if inflated appraisal waiver or “hybrid” sales become the new comps? 

Communication advice for Realtors: It’s going to be key to ask for a business card and be sure you know who you are talking to. My advice? Show up with my appraiser info sheet filled out so an “inspector” can hopefully pass along relevant details to the appraiser. Remember though, the appraiser is getting paid very little do this type of report (I hear $100 to $150), so the “hybrid” system is not designed to encourage appraisers to spend lots of time on the appraisal… 

I hope that was helpful or interesting.

Questions: What do you think of “hybrid” valuations? What are the positives and negatives? Any stories to share?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.