There was an interesting article in the Sacramento Bee a couple days ago entitled “Home appraisers work under tougher rules“. There were some good points made overall, and I think the author was fairly well balanced, but I wanted to respond to a few things.

Finger Pointing: There are many recent articles lately about how appraisers are to blame for the housing crisis. There is certainly some blame to accept if an appraiser misstated the market, and I am not minimizing that at all, but it’s important to keep in mind that the appraiser is absolutely not always to blame. During the housing boom there was certainly mortgage fraud, but let’s remember that prices really did rise to ridiculous levels, buyers were willing to pay those prices, and lenders had extremely loose standards where almost anyone could purchase a home – whether they could afford it or not. For instance, I had a friend who bought in the Natomas area of Sacramento and didn’t have to show any verification of income to borrow more than $400,000. Maybe the appraisal on his loan in 2004 was bad for some reason, but one thing for sure is that there need not be an automatic finger pointed at the appraiser in an instance like this.

Appraisal Reviews: The article quotes a loan officer saying he used to have so few appraisals reviewed, but nowadays the bulk of his appraisals have to be formally reviewed by the lender at a cost of $125 a pop to the Borrower. I’m not saying there aren’t really bad appraisals out there, but had lending guidelines in 2005 been what they are today, this loan officer may have experienced just as many appraisal reviews then as he does now. Lenders are requiring more of Borrowers these days, and even more work from appraisers too. If you are in the lending industry or in the process of obtaining a loan, I’d be curious to hear your perspective.

Low Fees: The article discusses the “middleman” and how appraisers are hired by neutral third-parties nowadays called Appraisal Management Companies aka “AMCs” (for loan appraisals only – not other types of appraisals). I think the article did a good job describing this process. There are some solid AMCs out there who treat their appraisers well and pay them decently too, but there are also some really bad ones. Here is an email I received a couple weeks ago verbatim from one of the “bad guys”. This was a blast email that went out to numerous appraisers for a property in a semi-rural area with VERY limited market data. I have never worked for this company because of their low fees. Based on their email, do you sense they are interested in obtaining a quality appraisal report?

We are searching for an appraiser to do a Drive by appraisal. The standard fee is $175.00 . Please let me know if you are currently employed through an AMC. We must get special approval to have you complete if that is the case.

Please let us know if you would consider this appraisal request for our standard fee. If you require a different fee, please specify by responding to this email with your fee and turn time. If the fee requested is higher than the standard fee, we will note it in our system and continue our search.

DO NOT PROCEED WITH THIS ORDER, THIS IS AN INQUIRY. You will not be paid if we do not send the formal order and obtain your acceptance.

If you have any questions or a need for an appraisal or consulting in the Sacramento area, give me a call at 916.595.3735, send me an email, catch me on Facebook, or see my company website at www.LundquistCompany.com.

Dorothea Puente’s locally famous duplex at 1426 F Street in Sacramento has sold for $215,000. This foreclosure property originally listed at $309,800 on 02/26/10 and eventually went to auction after a series of price decreases and over 150 days of market exposure.

This property has a notorious history (can you say “stigma”?) from the 1980s when seven bodies were found on the premises buried in the backyard. Dorothea Puente ran a “boarding house” at this location where she drugged and murdered  tenants to cash their social security checks.

More information? I wrote previously about this property twice: Would you buy Dorothea Puente’s house? and Dorothea Puente’s duplex is still on the market. Any takers? The Sacramento Bee published a Puente article yesterday and KCRA did a story too.

People ask me sometimes what I think about websites like Zillow or Cyberhomes. In short, I don’t think computers do as good of a job appraising properties as real humans. Call me biased, but there are some things that real people can still do better than machines. However, though these websites cannot fully replace real estate appraisers, they do have a place to help gain a ballpark figure for a house (please take that with a grain of salt though because figures can still be way off). Additionally, I’m a fan of the multi-year trend graphs that Zillow produces.

The Sacramento Bee actually published an article last Friday about this very topic entitled Home Front: Appraisal sites on Net often fail to pin down accurate prices. The bottom line is that websites like Zillow seem to have greater accuracy in tract markets with ample sales, but even then they are only so good because they cannot sift through value indicators like condition, important neighborhood boundaries, upgrades, and a local appraiser’s knowledge of the market area.

I ran some test cases over recent work I have done and found the following:

- My house (tract): Zillow was 28% high / Cyberhomes was 24% high.
- Elk Grove house 2.0 acres: Zillow was 46% low / Cymberhomes had no value.
- Tract House in Davis: Cyberhomes was 4% high / Zillow was 2.5% high.
- Sacramento River property: Zillow was 40% low / Cymberhomes had no value.
- Tract House in Galt: Zillow was 9.5% high / Cyberhomes was 5.0% low.

What do you think of these websites? What do you think they’re useful for? Do me a favor and run your property by Zillow and/or Cyberhomes and let me know the results.

Last Friday the Sacramento Bee came out with a story that Dorthea Puente’s old house at 1426 F Street in Sacramento would be going up for sale. Who is Dorethea Puente, you ask? She is a woman who ran a “boarding house” in the 1980s out of her Sacramento Victorian duplex. Unfortunately though instead of finding respite her tenants were drugged and murdered so their social security checks could be cashed. Eventually seven bodies were found buried in Dorothea’s backyard.

This property sold for $560,000 on 08/31/2005, went into foreclosure last year, and is now listed on the market at $309,800 as of 02/26/2010. The current MLS listing states, “Property has notorious history that must be disclosed.” 

Would you have any problems purchasing a property like this? Or would you consider renting this house? Would it bother you on any level or be no big deal? Creepy? Good investment? If you are a real estate agent, have you had experience selling a property with a stigma due to a murder, violent crime or some other heinous or notorious issue?

Original photos of 1426 F Street (it was a bit cloudy today unfortunately):