• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

  • About
  • Appraisals
  • Order
  • Ask Ryan
  • Areas
  • Classes
  • Press
  • Trends
  • Share
  • Contact

Do appraisers require smoke detectors?

January 23, 2014 By Ryan Lundquist 10 Comments

I had a great question about smoke detectors last week from a REALTOR friend. Here is her question and I’ll pitch in some thoughts below:

Smoke-Detector-photoQuestion: I have a buyer’s agent telling me we need smoke detectors installed in each bedroom. The condo has two bedrooms right across the hall from each other. The smoke detector is isolated on the ceiling in the hall between the two bedrooms. Will the appraiser require smoke detectors inside each bedroom? Built in 1990.

Answer: Maybe, but maybe not. There are a few things to consider. California code as of now states properties built or remodeled after August 14, 1992 require smoke detectors inside the bedrooms as well as in the hallway and Living Room near the bedrooms. However, if a property has had any remodeling or repairs requiring a permit totaling more than $1000 since August 14, 1992, then smoke detectors in bedrooms are required. Technically properties built before this date (and not remodeled or repaired since) do not require smoke detectors in the bedrooms, though they are still required in the hallway near the bedrooms and the Living Room no matter what. Ultimately the appraiser should at least require smoke detectors where they are required by California law. In some cases though the appraiser does not require the installation of smoke detectors because they are not required by code. However, the lender can still require them regardless of what local code or the appraiser says. In fact, I have a lender client that asks me to take photos of each smoke detector to prove that they are indeed installed (on all appraisals regardless of the age of the property). Lastly, some appraisers may treat smoke detectors in bedrooms as a health and safety issue and simply require them in bedrooms and elsewhere regardless of what local code says. For reference, FHA will require them only so far as they are required by code. In short, you’ll get a mixture of responses depending on the age of the property, what local and state code says and how your appraiser and lender interpret that code. Your “safest” bet is to simply install them.

Footnote: Different jurisdictions can have more stringent regulations, so be sure to know what your state and local county says. There are some new smoke alarm laws hitting the books in 2014 to 2016. The regulations seem to mostly deal with batteries and smoke alarm manufacturing dates being listed on the device.

Bonus: You might also want to read Where to install carbon monoxide detectors in your home.

Question: Any thoughts or questions? Comments are welcome below.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Appraisal Stuff Tagged With: appraiser requirements, California, code for smoke detectors, code requirements, Home Appraiser, House Appraiser, lenders, Sacramento County, smoke alarm laws 2014 and 2015, smoke detectors

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Raymond Henson says

    January 23, 2014 at 7:41 AM

    I understand that most fires start in the garage and code says we need a fire rated door going into the house, hinges that automatically close the door, thicker drywall where the house and garage meet and no holes in those areas of the drywall. I have always been curious why smoke detectors aren’t required in the garage. Too many false alarms?

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      January 23, 2014 at 7:51 AM

      Insightful comment, Ray. I’m pretty sure there would be a revolt if the rules changed because too many people smoke cigarettes in the garage. 🙂

      Reply
  2. Lynn vockrodt says

    January 23, 2014 at 8:33 AM

    This information will help when clients want to argue. Smoke detectors are inexpensiv, thank goodness !

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      January 23, 2014 at 8:40 AM

      You’re right about that Lynn. Thankfully they are a low-ticket item. In most cases they are probably going to be required, but there are times when they are technically not (in the bedrooms at least).

      Reply
  3. Tom Horn says

    January 23, 2014 at 8:57 AM

    Thanks for sharing Ryan. With everything else we have to consider during our inspection this is often overlooked.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      January 23, 2014 at 12:23 PM

      True, Tom. It’s easy to overlook smoke detectors, yet it’s a big issue because of safety and state law.

      Reply
  4. Danny Tarantino says

    October 7, 2014 at 7:10 PM

    Ryan – This information really helped me out today. I met an appraiser at one of our listings on 59th street that was built in 1929. It definitely had not been updated after 1992. In any event, he made me go to Home Depot and buy two more smoke detectors and install them in each bedroom even though I had one in the hallway going to the bedroom. He stated he needed to take pictures of all 3 and sign a document stating he saw them in the rooms…..I didn’t battle him on it because I wanted to be in his good graces, however, unless the lender actually required him to do this, it does not sound like I needed to put them in. I guess Ill never know.
    Your blogs are always so insightful so Thank You for doing what you do and educating us all a little more.
    Danny Tarantino
    Keller Williams Realty Elk Grove

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      October 8, 2014 at 5:43 AM

      Thanks Danny. I appreciate you sharing the story, and I’m so glad this was able to help you out. I wonder if in this situation the lender or brokerage was requiring smoke detectors. Most clients seem to stick with what code says, but I do have a good lender client that requires me to take photos of smoke detectors, and I can imagine them requiring despite them technically not being required by local code. The safety aspect has been a huge emphasis for many lenders. Nonetheless, knowing what code actually requires is very powerful to be able to speak truth into situations where there is sometimes misunderstanding. By the way, I’m speaking at your office next week on the 14th I believe. Hope to see you there.

      Reply
  5. Danny Tarantino says

    October 8, 2014 at 2:29 PM

    I will definitely be there. See you then!

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      October 8, 2014 at 4:41 PM

      Right on, Danny. See you then.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Raymond Henson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Ryan

 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Instagram

Subscribe to Weekly Post

* indicates required

Search this site

Blog Categories

  • Appraisal Stuff (407)
  • Bankruptcy (3)
  • Divorce (4)
  • Estate Settlement (6)
  • FHA Appraisal Articles (56)
  • Internet (53)
  • Market Trends (482)
  • Photos from the Field (126)
  • Property Taxes (70)
  • Random Stuff (231)
  • Resources (566)
  • Videos (161)

Blog Archives: 2009 – 2021

Lundquist Appraisal Links

  • Appraisal Order Form
  • Appraisal Website
  • Rancho Cordova Appraiser Website
  • Sacramento Appraisal Blog Sitemap
  • Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser Facebook Page
  • Twitter: Sacramento Appraiser (@SacAppraiser)
  • YouTube: Sacramento Appraiser Channel

Most Recent Posts

  • How much have prices risen since the bottom of the market?
  • How long can this market keep going?
  • What is your housing persona?
  • Rapid price growth & the Gilmore Girls next door
  • Are first-time buyers targeting 2-4 unit properties?
  • Stale real estate headlines & buyers flocking to El Dorado County
  • My new sewer line adds huge value, right?
  • The housing market nobody predicted
  • Real estate trends to watch in 2021
  • You carried me & a spreadsheet for Christmas

Disclaimer

First off, thank you for being here. Now let's get into the fine print. The material and information contained on this website is the copyrighted property of Ryan Lundquist and Lundquist Appraisal Company. Content on this website may not be reproduced or republished without prior written permission from Ryan Lundquist.

Please see my Sharing Policy on the navigation bar if you are interested in sharing portions of any content on this blog.

The information on this website is meant entirely for educational purposes and is not intended in any way to support an opinion of value for your appraisal needs or any sort of value conclusion for a loan, litigation, tax appeal or any other potential real estate or non-real estate purpose. The material found on this website is meant for casual reading only and is not intended for use in a court of law or any other legal use. Ryan will not appear in court in any capacity based on any information posted here. For more detailed market analysis to be used for an appraisal report or any appraisal-related purpose or valuation consulting, please contact Ryan at 916-595-3735 for more information.

There are no affiliate links on this blog, but there are three advertisements. Please do your homework before doing business with any advertisers as advertisements are not affiliated with this blog in any way. Two ads are located on the sidebar and one is at the bottom of each post. The ads earn a minor amount of revenue and are a simple reward for providing consistent original content to readers. If you think the ads interfere with your blog experience or the integrity of the blog somehow, let me know. I'm always open to feedback. Thank you again for being here.

Copyright © 2021 Sacramento Appraisal Blog