Imagine not being able to see home prices. How would we measure value? In other words, could we determine higher values in one area compared to another based on things like school ratings, owner occupancy rates, or the income of residents? Let’s consider that, talk about the market in terms of Starbucks cups, and then dig deep into Sacramento trends for those interested. Any thoughts?
If we couldn’t see prices, what would be the best indicator of value?
1) Income of residents.
2) School ratings.
3) Percentage of owner occupied units.
4) Crime rates.
5) Length of grass.
6) Walking score.
7) Proximity to Downtown.
8) Proximity to coffee shops.
9) Number of cats in the neighborhood (thanks Gary).
10) What else?
The Takeaway: If we didn’t have access to prices in an area we could probably analyze some of the list above to get a sense of higher or lower values in certain areas. Ultimately we have to remember value is about the stuff behind the price, so it’s key to be in tune with what’s making value move in various places.
Here is a Twitter poll I ran:
Starbucks cups instead of price: Keeping with the theme, let’s talk about the market in terms of the cost of Starbucks cups (tall size) instead of price.
Real stats in the Sacramento region (but with coffee):
1) The median price softened by 2,512 cups of Starbucks coffee last month.
2) Since summer the median price has softened by 5,128 cups of coffee.
3) The median price will likely decline by 10,000 cups of coffee this fall.
4) The median price is up 15,384 coffee cups compared to last year.
Okay, don’t take me too seriously on this. But isn’t it interesting to think about value beyond just price? Next week: Avocado toast price metrics… (kidding).
I hope that was interesting. Anything to add?
–——-——- Big monthly market update (it’s long on purpose) ———–——-
We’re at that time of year. Sales volume has likely peaked for the season. The median price probably climaxed in the summer. Housing inventory is increasing, and each month it’s taking longer to sell in Sacramento. Overall the market has a slower feel compared to a few months ago, values have begun to soften in many areas, and even rents have been flat for a few months according to Yardi Matrix. We’re seeing a seasonal softening in county-wide stats (especially regional stats), but we’re also observing slowness in many neighborhoods as homes are tending to have less offers, less traffic, and even sell for slightly less than the highest prices from a few months back. News like this sometimes freaks people out because they think the market is tanking, but like clockwork the market almost always softens during the fall.
A huge stat to know: Every year the median price and average sales price in Sacramento County tend to soften by about 5%. This doesn’t necessarily mean values decline by 5% in every neighborhood or price range, but it does mean we can expect price softening in most areas during the fall season.
A word to sellers: Don’t be that stereotypical person who doesn’t listen to the market when it comes to price. Right now the market is slowing and the number of price reductions is higher than it’s been all year. As long as you’re priced reasonably you’re going to get offers, but be cautious not to price unrealistically high because you’re hearing the market is blazing “hot”.
I could go on, but let’s get visual.
DOWNLOAD 73 graphs HERE: Please download all graphs in this post and more here as a zip file (includes a stat sheet too). See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).
SACRAMENTO COUNTY (more graphs & stats here):
SACRAMENTO COUNTY STATS:
- The median price is currently $347,500 and dipped 0.1% last month.
- The median price is 9.6% higher than the same time last year.
- Sales volume in September was 6.8% lower this year than 2016. There were 1499 single family detached sales last month.
- It took an average of 26 days to sell a home last month (one year ago it was taking 4 days longer).
- The median days on market last month was 14 days.
- It took 2 more days to sell in September compared to August (median days).
- FHA sales were 19.4% of all sales last month in the county.
- Only 1% of sales last month were bank-owned & 1.1% were short sales.
- The avg price per sq ft was about $223, which is slightly higher than last month (11% higher than last year).
- The avg sales price increased about 1.3% last month and is currently $384,000. This is 10.9% higher than last year.
- Cash sales were 13% of all sales last month.
SACRAMENTO REGION (more graphs & stats here):
SACRAMENTO REGION STATS:
- The median price is $385,000 and declined about 1% last month.
- The median price is 8.4% higher than the same time last year.
- Sales volume in September was 3.6% lower this year than 2016. There were 2422 single family detached sales last month.
- It took an average of 31 days to sell a home last month (one year ago it was taking 4 days longer).
- The median days on market last month was 15 days, which means properties are selling really quickly.
- The median days on market increased by 2 days last month, which helps shows a slowing in the market.
- FHA sales were 16.1% of all sales last month.
- Only 1.1% of sales last month were bank-owned & 0.8% were short sales.
- The avg price per sq ft was about $228, which increased about 1% last month (10% higher than last year).
- The avg sales price declined about 1% last month and is currently $425,516. This is 8.3% higher than last year.
- Cash sales were 14.9% of all sales last month.
PLACER COUNTY (more graphs & stats here):
PLACER COUNTY STATS:
- The median price is currently $450,000 and declined about 3% last month.
- The median price is 4% higher than the same time last year.
- Sales volume in September was 1.3% less this year than 2016. There were 524 single family detached sales.
- It took an average of 34 days to sell a home last month (one year ago it was taking 7 days longer).
- The median days on market last month was 18 days, which means properties are selling really quickly.
- The median days on market increased by 3 days last month, which helps shows a slowing in the market.
- FHA sales were 12.9% of all sales.
- There were only 3 bank-owned sales last month and only 2 short sales.
- The avg price per sq ft was $231, which is slightly higher than last month (9.1% higher than last year).
- The avg sales price decreased about 3.5% last month and is currently $490,615. This is 1.6% higher than last year.
- Cash sales were 17.1% of all sales last month.
DOWNLOAD 73 graphs HERE: Please download all graphs in this post and more here as a zip file (includes a stat sheet too). See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).
Questions: Besides price, what do you think the strongest indicator of value is for a neighborhood? Anything else you’re seeing in the market? Should we start a Starbucks Cups Price Index maybe? I’d love to hear your take.
If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.
Gary Kristensen says
Your blog posts are always thought provoking. Is there an inverse relationship between the number of cats in the neighborhood and home value?
Ryan Lundquist says
Gary, this is amazing. I added cats to the list. Too good. Haha. 🙂
Wes Blackwell says
Great article Ryan. Working with investors and investment properties, we try to look for things indicating growth in property value IN THE FUTURE. North Oak Park is the perfect example.
Things to look for:
1) Recent increase in number of breweries and juice bars
2) At least 3 people who show up to the open house have blue hair
3) Most properties receive multiple offers
4) Most rents currently way under market
5) Article in the newspaper every few months talking about the pros and cons of gentrification
As for income level relating to property value, I think it would be an extremely interesting study to compare each zip code’s income level to its median property value and see just how much of a correlation actually exists.
Ryan Lundquist says
I love your take and way of looking at things Wes. I think we need to watch the numbers in a neighborhood, but also pay attention to media stories, types of businesses, rents, etc… All of these things tell a story. I agree with you.
Let’s hope someone does a study like that soon. It would be intriguing and probably disheartening to a certain extent to see what money can really bring you or opportunities that don’t exist for some without money.
Mark says
Why doesn’t anyone ever use Neveda county in there statistics/comparisons? When I see comparisons, Nevada county is hardly mentioned. There are more and more people moving to Nevada county each year. Especially people from the Bay Area. Just asking the question.
Ryan Lundquist says
Hi Mark. Thanks for the question. It’s a good one. For me I do not include Nevada County for two reasons: 1) I don’t do much work there (hardly ever); 2) Nevada County data is not included in Sacramento MLS. I still have access to it, but it is actually located in a different MLS system. Thus I think for many it’s a practical matter of not having immediate access to the data. On top of this, the media tends to look to some of the bigger real estate associations like Sacramento for details on the market (and Sacramento does not cover Nevada County either). I would hope there would be a Nevada County Realtor Association that is publishing data on a consistent basis. Lastly, it’s important to realize there is less data coming out of Nevada County, so monthly numbers might not be as valuable as quarterly numbers. When there are fewer sales (even with Placer County), the numbers can vary quite a bit from month to month.
Tom Horn says
Ok, Ryan, your list does include factors many that buyers probably do take into consideration. I’m going to go into geek mode here and suggest that we look at supply and demand stats. What if we considered how many homes have sold over the past year, how many are available for sale now and also look at buyer behavior, such as the number of people interested in moving into the area. Of course, these are things appraisers analyze already. I think the items you listed will have a direct impact on the stats we study and that is what we should be looking at. A large number of recent sales in an area with current low inventory but a lot of people wanting to buy would indicate high values. Thanks for making us think, Ryan.
Ryan Lundquist says
Thanks Tom. I appreciate your thoughts and desire to “geek out”. It’s so important to pour through the numbers, and most of all to know which questions to ask. I tend to agree with your last statement, though I’ll add having huge demand and low inventory is still not a trump card for stopping the slowing of the seasonal market. I don’t think you were saying that at all, but I wanted to mention it because the seasonal slowing almost always happens. The only year I can think of it not happening was 2012 when investors were buying EVERYTHING in the market. I guess when you have outside institutional investors hit the market in mass, it tends to change the market. More than anything that fall season was an outlier.