I get this question quite a bit. Why didn’t the appraiser add the square footage of the ADU to the main house? The idea is the accessory dwelling in the backyard should be lumped into the total square footage, and since it wasn’t, maybe the appraiser undervalued the property. Let’s talk about it. I have some market recap stats today too. Any thoughts?

UPCOMING SPEAKING GIGS:
10/18/24 Prime Real Estate (private)
10/22/24 Culbertson and Gray Group (private (I think))
10/23/24 SAFE Credit Union (details TBA)
10/29/24 Orangevale MLS Meeting
11/7/2024 Think Like an Appraiser (3 hours) TBA
11/19/24 Downtown Regional MLS Meeting Q&A 9am
12/5/24 Made 4 More Team (Exporting Data from MLS)
IT’S NOT ATTACHED TO THE HOUSE
To be considered as gross living area (square footage), the area needs to be connected to the house and accessible through the house. If you have to go outside the main living area to enter a separate structure, it is not proper to include as part of the living space of the house according to ANSI standards (“ANSI” stands for “American National Standards Institute”). This means an appraiser should not lump a detached accessory dwelling or other detached areas with the square footage of the main house. Here’s a real example from years ago. I did not include this ADU in the square footage because it was not connected and accessible to the living area of the main house.

USING LOGIC
I know some might say, “Hey, I don’t really care what some national organization says about lumping square footage together or not.” I get it. On one hand this rule seems arbitrary, and it’s always possible we could think differently about this in the future, but let’s step back and use logic. If a homeowner has a 1,500 sq ft house and adds a 1,200 sq ft ADU in the backyard, has it really become a 2,700 sq ft house? I think logic tells us the answer is NO. This is still 1,500 sq ft, but it clearly now has something else that needs to be considered in the value. Maybe it will sell for the same price as other 2,700 sq ft homes, but what if it sold for more or less? It seems like an awkward comparison if we only use larger homes as comps because we’ve basically used non-similar properties to tell us what this home is worth. It’s like using oranges to describe the value of an apple. Show me a home around the same size with an ADU to help support what the market is willing to pay for something like this. That seems like a much better way to support value because we’re comparing apples to apples. Remember, a buyer shopping for a 2,700 sq ft home may not even be able to consider a 1,500 sq ft home because it might not work for the size of the household.
DOESN’T MEAN IT’S WORTH NOTHING
A huge concern is that an ADU cannot count in the value if it is not counted in the square footage, but that’s completely false. Who made that rule anyway? There are many things that are not square footage that can count in the value such as a pool, covered patio, detached garage, driveway, landscaping, hardscape, etc… An appraiser can definitely recognize value for the ADU in the appraisal report by making an adjustment for it.

COST & VALUE AREN’T ALWAYS THE SAME THING
ADUs are all the rage, but they are also really expensive. I just wanted to mention that cost doesn’t always equal value here. If an owner spends $225,000 to construct an ADU on a $600,000 house, that doesn’t automatically mean the house is now worth $825,000. Let’s find comps to tell us what the market is willing to pay for a house with an ADU. That’s the key. On that note, it might be helpful to think of an ADU as a marathon asset that’s going to add value for decades ahead, but when buyers are sprinting to the market, they may not be willing to pay for the full cost of the ADU in one instance. Maybe they will though. This is where we have to look to the comps. All that said, I’ll admit one of the hard parts is it’s not always easy to find good data (and interpreting the data correctly is key too). Here’s a post with some tips for valuing an ADU.
FINDING ACCESSORY DWELLINGS IN MLS
One of the keys for being able to value ADUs is finding them in MLS. In addition to searching the property description for words like “ADU” or “guest quarters,” here is another step. Pull up a map search and hit “search criteria” on the right side, and then select “fields” under the close button. Then pick “other structures” and save. This means you will now be able to use the other structures field whenever opening up a map search. Now, select “other structures” and then “guest house.” That’s what I did here for only six months of sales, and look what came up. In some areas, I would do one year at a time and be unafraid to look at multiple years of data to hopefully find something. Remember, we might not use really old sales as comps, but maybe we can use them as research to understand how buyers have historically behaved. Of course, sometimes the search results are not really showing ADUs, so I’m going to have to eliminate a pool house, she-shed, and other stuff. But at least this gives me something to work with. Sometimes people say stuff like, “Bro, I can’t find any ADUs.” Maybe that’s true. But have you exhausted all the ways you can research in MLS?

ADDING TOGETHER IN MLS
I appreciate when a listing in MLS does not lump the size of the main house and ADU together. It helps everyone when considering comps. Brokers, is it a liability issue to include the square footage together? Or maybe it’s a non-issue? I’d love to hear your input.
I hope this was helpful. Now for some stats.
A MARKET UPDATE
Friends, I have a market update, but I need to confess I got swept up in the Dexter craze since the series is now streaming on Netflix. I’m only on season three though, so no spoilers please.

BRIEF MARKET DESCRIPTION
It’s been a pretty normal fall season as we’re seeing a descent from the spring market with lower volume, more supply, more price reductions, and prices leveling off. This is what we expect to see at the time of year. But the market still has a weird lackluster vibe with such a low number of sales happening. Moreover, we’ve seen sellers come back more than buyers this year, so the housing temperature is definitely not the same as last year (especially for overpriced units). It is taking longer to sell today, but days on market is very close to the pre-2020 normal, so I think there is an adjustment here for sellers and even the real estate community. In other words, don’t expect 2021 speed in 2024. All things said, the market hasn’t become this dynamic hot zone like some maybe expected would happen when the Fed cut rates.

YEAR OVER YEAR STATS
Some smaller counties don’t have much data, so I lumped them into 60-day chunks. One month just isn’t enough (too erratic). I have all these images and more on the STATS tab.

MONTH TO MONTH STATS

I hope this was interesting or helpful.
Questions: Anything to add about accessory dwellings? What are you seeing out there in the market right now? I’d love to hear your take.
If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.
Ryan – great post as always. Our office (Sacramento County Assessor) is currently in the midst of taking a deep dive into using our newly enhanced building characteristics to answer that burning question – how much value does the ADU contribute?
If your readers are not aware, we now break down or itemized the basic building characteristics of each residential dwelling on a single assessor’s parcel (APN) on our Parcel Viewer tool on our website. https://assessor.saccounty.gov/Pages/default.aspx
We have been making presentations to REALTOR groups in our area on a monthly basis. We have sent information to CoreLogic (who mines our data and republishes it) in the hopes our data will be accurately represented in MLS. However, we have no control over third-parties. We are also proactively auditing property records in an effort to classify dwellings accurately (i.e., Primary SFR, Secondary SFR &/or ADU). We are not breaking out Junior ADUs as they are included in the Primary SFR GLA (if under the same roof).
Jim, I meant to share this, but I’m so thankful you did. I really appreciate the work you are doing to promote clarity.
Just the same way a 500′ garage conversion does not make a 1500′ 3/2+500 gar conv house compete in the same way as a 3/2-2,000′ house
The spaces in a 3/2-2,000 are originally constructed to be bigger per space on the order of OVER 30% bigger than a 3/2-1500+500gar conversion.
I cant count a 500′ ADU + 1500 house as a 2,000′ house. different bed/bath counts, HIGHLY unlikely they were built at same time and are under same quality or condition or type of construction.
Thanks m w. Yeah, a garage conversion gets interesting too. What value does the extra space add? And what value might it take away since the garage was removed? Sometimes conversions can feel awkward in the layout and quality does not always match the rest of the house.
Appraisers are often asked this question about what is included in the “finished area above grade” or “gross living area”. It’s great to have this blog post to point to.
Thanks Gary. I have been asked this question quite a bit lately, and that’s one reason why I wrote this post. Haha. Hope you’re well.
I’m teaching an ADU class next week so this is very timely. Yolo County had 1100 sfr sales in Metrolist in 2023 and 25 were reported to have ADUs. I’ll add guest house to my search for discussion. In any case, figuring out the value contribution of an ADU is hard.
Thanks Joe. I know you’ll do great in your class. Yeah, it’s tough. I find we have to try so many ways to even find ADUs on MLS. I do have more luck with the “guest house” house search, but it’s not perfect. Some areas are going to have them more than others too.
My three go to resources for plagiarism and quotes about ADU’s are 2023 Guide to ADU Laws in California, State of California Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook and FNMA minimum requirements for ADU’s. Helps for guidance.
Thanks David.
Wow. Duh.
Legality is the question to ask about ADU units.
I can’t believe majority of posters here and author forgot the most important question !
Helloooo
Thanks Hank. Legality is not the issue, but it is obviously very important. Even if fully legal and permitted, the square footage for a detached unit does not get lumped into the square footage of the house due to the reasons I mentioned above.
Yes not the det. house….because the ADU is NOT legal.
…but the total GBA if LEGAL. GLA is a for single family’s on a 1004. But if the ADU is legal it should be put on a 1025 form. Again, you are missing the important question here.
is ADU legal or not.
Hank, I think you’re coming from a different angle. This post is about total square footage. Are you saying a 1,000 sq ft house and a 500 st ft detached ADU should be considered 1500 sq ft if the ADU is legally permitted? The 1004 form has a place for a single family unit with an ADU, so I’m not sure why a 1025 form would be needed. Are you ignoring that the 1004 allows for an ADU?
Any bank underwriter who knows their stuff is aware that ADUs attached to s/families are counted separate in GLA and are given minimal value. The IMPORTANT question to ask is LEGALITY. Even if a 1004 but the ADU it NOT legal it should be disclosed and given ZERO value. If legal. Then it belongs on a multi unit form w GBA and income considered as it is a legal unit. FNMA rule and guideline for decades.
Thanks for your take, Hank. I don’t agree with it, but I appreciate it.
Zero value? IF the market is willing to pay something for it, it seems like that should be reflected in the value, no? I would doubt buyers would pay nothing for a quality-built ADU that is not permitted. Even if it was just storage, I have to think it’s worth something…