• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

  • About
  • Appraisals
  • Order
  • Ask Ryan
  • Areas
  • Classes
  • Press
  • Trends
  • Share
  • Contact

Stairway to functional obsolescence

August 28, 2012 By Ryan Lundquist 11 Comments

This is a nice looking house, right? It has upgrades galore and is over 4000 square feet. There are five bedrooms, four full bathrooms and a decent-sized lot. This house may be slightly overpriced, but on top of that, prospective buyers have not been making offers. Take a close look and see if you can guess why no offers have been made. What do you see?

Example of functional obsolescence

Why is this house sitting on the market? While this property has many appealing features, the stairs have been an issue for buyers according to the Listing Agent. Why? Because there are stairs to get to the front porch from the driveway, stairs inside from the first floor to the second floor and stairs from the garage to the first floor of the home. We expect stairs inside, but it can be very taxing for buyers to have to walk up stairs to get into the house from the driveway and through the garage. There is literally no other way to access the house besides going up stairs. This would of course be a great way to burn calories, but it would be a pain for grocery shopping, baby transport and many other everyday details of life.

What is functional obsolescence? It is ”a reduction in the usefulness or desirability of an object because of an outdated (or odd) design feature, usually one that cannot be easily changed” (from Investopedia). We see functional obsolescence when there is a feature of a house that is not useful to buyers for one reason or another. It may have been acceptable at some point in the past, but is now outdated, or it may simply be odd and less appealing. Other examples of functional obsolescence include having to walk through a bedroom to get to another bedroom, having no dishwasher in the kitchen, no laundry hook-ups, or having no bathrooms on the first floor of a house.

This is a very nice home that’ll sell eventually, but since all buyers have passed on this property so far, it’ll likely sell at a discount because of the stairs. While appraising a home in this neighborhood, I chose not to use this listing in my appraisal report because of the stairs. I explained in my report why this property was not a good indicator of value for the market.

Would stairs like this matter to you?

If you have any questions or Sacramento area real estate appraisal or property tax appeal needs, contact me by phone 916-595-3735, email, Twitter, subscribe to posts by email or “like” my page on Facebook

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Appraisal Stuff, Resources Tagged With: 2-story house, appraisal report functional obsolescence, appraiser functional obsolescence, example of functional obsolescence, Functional Obsolescence, Home Appriaser, House Appraiser, impact of stairs on real estate, porch stairs, sacramento appraisers, stairs

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jeff Grenz says

    August 28, 2012 at 12:24 PM

    Would it be valued more as an exercise course?

    As a college freshman, I was placed in the 3rd floor of the dorms. While elevators had been invented, this private university hadn’t funded them for mere students. A dozen+ daily up and down was all the exercise I needed.

    I’m pleased to know you didn’t use this type of home as a comp. My $800K buyers just viewed five 4,000 sf homes in Folsom this spring. One was a 3 level similar to this. Much of the footage was lost in the stairwells and the home felt and lived much smaller….similar to a 3,000-3,200 sf home. Two of the other homes were receiving multiple (10-12+) offers $100K+ more, while the 3 level home received none. That’s a lot of buyers expressing their opinion’s with their pocket book.

    As a builder, single level homes cost more per foot to build, but also generally sell easier. You’ll notice in new subdivisions that the smaller models are typically single level, and even though priced less in total, are often 15-20% more per foot than the larger 2 stories, reflecting differences in building cost as well as size efficiency.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      August 28, 2012 at 12:35 PM

      I bet you were in outstanding shape in college (not that you aren’t now). For the record, I was on both the 2nd floor and the first floor during college (though I only dormed one year).

      Great insight, Jeff. I appreciate hearing your 800K buyer story and the builder perspective too. You’re so right about price per square foot. That’s exactly why a broad price per square foot metric is dangerous to apply to an entire market. Price per square foot is more accurate when we break up the market into similar chunks instead.

      There is usually more to the story when a large home is not selling anywhere near where others are. How crazy to see a $100K difference. Layout and utility matters greatly though.

      Reply
  2. Heidi says

    August 28, 2012 at 3:53 PM

    We have friends with a house like that. It is very annoying, especially with little kids.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      August 28, 2012 at 4:00 PM

      Thanks for the inside scoop Heidi. I bet your friends have strong leg muscles. 🙂

      Reply
  3. Sonja Troncoso says

    August 29, 2012 at 9:06 AM

    My house has a large set of stairs up to the front door, and inside has one easy split level 1/2 stairs to the next level. Once someone is in, its good, but I have been told by my folks in their 80’s and a neighbor that the entry stairs are a problem for them and that they are glad they dont have my set of stairs. I look at it like this, would be burglars would not like to carry a bunch of stuff down those stairs fast to make a get away either. Actually, my dog even hesitates sometimes wanting to go up or down those front stairs and long uphill driveway too.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      August 29, 2012 at 3:47 PM

      I love the insight, Sonja. It’s interesting to hear your neighbor’s perspective (and your dog). I suppose part of the issue here is age too.

      Reply
  4. Tom Horn says

    August 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM

    Something like this is not uncommon in my market, however if it is not typical in the area it is located in I can see it as being a reason people would not want to buy it. I guess in this instance functional obsolescence would be relative to where you are at.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      August 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM

      Well said, Tom. I think you’re right about that. If every house had the stairs, it would be a non-issue because buyers would expect it. In this situation, all the other houses in the neighborhood did not have the stairs from what I could see. That’s why I think it was an issue.

      Reply
  5. Akron Appraisal says

    February 26, 2013 at 9:15 AM

    Well Ryan, i think that In functional obsolescence an appraisal should measure rent penalty adjustment if the sales/rental data is available….

    Reply
  6. Paul Johns says

    May 3, 2018 at 9:15 AM

    From a San Francisco Realtor. I sold a 1906 (or earlier) house that had over 40 steep front steps. Young people were breathing heavy after climbing those steps, yet the last owner lived there until in her 80’s, another owner lived to 95 but moved out in his 80’s. Maybe the stairs kept them going.
    In San Francisco you expect stairs in single family homes – but not 40+ steep steps.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      May 3, 2018 at 11:30 AM

      What a golden comment. Thank you Paul. If you ever have a photo you want to share, I’d love to see it. The walking really could have been an asset. I’ve heard of people relocating from New York and then weight gain happens because there is so much less walking.

      I visited a friend recently in SF and it was interesting to see a couple homes that didn’t actually have any street frontage at all. There was a walking path to get to these homes. I can only imagine what it was like to bring groceries…. Hopefully you find a nearby parking spot.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Ryan

 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Instagram

Subscribe to Weekly Post

* indicates required

Search this site

Blog Categories

  • Appraisal Stuff (407)
  • Bankruptcy (3)
  • Divorce (4)
  • Estate Settlement (6)
  • FHA Appraisal Articles (56)
  • Internet (53)
  • Market Trends (481)
  • Photos from the Field (126)
  • Property Taxes (70)
  • Random Stuff (231)
  • Resources (566)
  • Videos (161)

Blog Archives: 2009 – 2021

Lundquist Appraisal Links

  • Appraisal Order Form
  • Appraisal Website
  • Rancho Cordova Appraiser Website
  • Sacramento Appraisal Blog Sitemap
  • Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser Facebook Page
  • Twitter: Sacramento Appraiser (@SacAppraiser)
  • YouTube: Sacramento Appraiser Channel

Most Recent Posts

  • How long can this market keep going?
  • What is your housing persona?
  • Rapid price growth & the Gilmore Girls next door
  • Are first-time buyers targeting 2-4 unit properties?
  • Stale real estate headlines & buyers flocking to El Dorado County
  • My new sewer line adds huge value, right?
  • The housing market nobody predicted
  • Real estate trends to watch in 2021
  • You carried me & a spreadsheet for Christmas
  • Real estate drama (and a market update)

Disclaimer

First off, thank you for being here. Now let's get into the fine print. The material and information contained on this website is the copyrighted property of Ryan Lundquist and Lundquist Appraisal Company. Content on this website may not be reproduced or republished without prior written permission from Ryan Lundquist.

Please see my Sharing Policy on the navigation bar if you are interested in sharing portions of any content on this blog.

The information on this website is meant entirely for educational purposes and is not intended in any way to support an opinion of value for your appraisal needs or any sort of value conclusion for a loan, litigation, tax appeal or any other potential real estate or non-real estate purpose. The material found on this website is meant for casual reading only and is not intended for use in a court of law or any other legal use. Ryan will not appear in court in any capacity based on any information posted here. For more detailed market analysis to be used for an appraisal report or any appraisal-related purpose or valuation consulting, please contact Ryan at 916-595-3735 for more information.

There are no affiliate links on this blog, but there are three advertisements. Please do your homework before doing business with any advertisers as advertisements are not affiliated with this blog in any way. Two ads are located on the sidebar and one is at the bottom of each post. The ads earn a minor amount of revenue and are a simple reward for providing consistent original content to readers. If you think the ads interfere with your blog experience or the integrity of the blog somehow, let me know. I'm always open to feedback. Thank you again for being here.

Copyright © 2021 Sacramento Appraisal Blog