Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

Main navigation

Is the market so “hot” that we won’t have a slow fall this year?

By 5 Comments

Values are going to keep going up. The market is so “hot” we’re not going to have a fall slowdown this year. I’ve heard this sentiment quite a bit lately and I’ve even thought it myself. Yet today let’s remember five things about the fall season. Then for those interested we’ll dive deeply into the latest Sacramento trends.

5 things to remember about the fall market:

1) A general truth: Unless we have reason to believe there won’t be a slower fall season, let’s believe there will be one because it’s normal for real estate to have seasons.

2) The typical signs are happening: When the market starts to slow we usually see certain symptoms, and we’re seeing those right now. Inventory has increased slightly, sales volume is starting to slough, and prices in the region dipped a bit last month. Yet Sacramento County stats are nothing but glowing, which makes it hard to believe a slowing could happen.

3) Slow vs. slowing: The market is NOT slow, but we’re seeing slowing. That’s a big distinction for many markets in the country right now. In reality it almost sounds offensive to say the market is slowing when we have multiple offers and bidding wars, but things right now don’t feel quite as aggressive as they did in April and May. We’re seeing slightly more price reductions, slightly less offers, and buyers more frequently not accepting counter offers like they did a few months ago. I know, this isn’t true in every transaction. All I’m saying is we are generally seeing more symptoms of a slowing market (but it’s NOT slow).

4) Not always dull: Sometimes the fall months can be really dull, but other times not so much. Thus even though the stats sag at the end of the year, it doesn’t always feel like the market is dragging. My guess is the fall softening this year will not feel as dull because of how low inventory is right now.

5) Rare: It’s rare to not have a seasonal market. The only time I can think of us not having a fall slowdown in recent years was in 2012 when investment funds and flippers were gutting the market. Values simply kept going up, and investors basically trumped the seasonal market that year.

I hope that was helpful or interesting. Any thoughts?

–——-——- Big monthly market update (it’s long on purpose) ———–——-

Glowing and slowing. That’s a good way to sum up the market. The stats are generally glowing, but we’re starting to see subtle signs of a seasonal slowing. Price stats in Sacramento County increased by about 1% last month and they’re up 8-10% from last year (that doesn’t mean actual values are up that much in every neighborhood and price range). Though if we look closely, especially in the region as a whole, prices dipped by 1% last month, inventory is up slightly, and sales volume sloughed off last month (which isn’t a surprise). Properties have been selling very quickly still in only 9 median days in Sacramento County and 11 in the region. For perspective, on average it was taking about a week longer to sell a home last year. The market actually tends to normally show a slowness in days on market between June and July, but we didn’t see that this year, which is a reminder the market feels a bit more aggressive right now compared to last year. Overall housing inventory increased last month, but the bigger story is it’s down about 14% in the region from last year. Despite all the glorious stats, the market is still price sensitive, which means buyers aren’t willing to pull the trigger at any price (did you hear that sellers?). Oh, and by the way, the median price in Sacramento County is now 10% from the peak in 2005. I could go on and on with words, but let me share some graphs to show the market visually.

DOWNLOAD 65 graphs HERE: Please download all graphs in this post and more here as a zip file (includes a stat sheet too). See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

Sacramento County graphs this month (more graphs & stats here):

Sacramento Regional graphs this month (more graphs & stats here):

Placer County graphs this month (more graphs & stats here):

DOWNLOAD 65 graphs (and stats) HERE: Please download all graphs in this post and more here as a zip file (includes a stat sheet too). See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

Questions: What signs of glowing or slowing are you seeing? Do you think we’ll have a fall market? Did I miss anything? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

When marijuana grow operations are down the street

By 13 Comments

Does it matter for value if there are a few legal marijuana grow operations in the neighborhood? That’s not really a question we asked much in the past, but it’s definitely a reality in many portions of California now since recreational marijuana was approved at the ballots last year. I know this is a polarizing topic, but legal cannabis cultivation is something we have to pay attention to now in real estate – regardless of our personal views. Today let’s look at a specific situation I encountered a few weeks ago and consider a few takeaways.

Not an advocate: Just to clarify, I am writing for the sake of analyzing real estate trends. I am not a cannabis advocate in any way and this post is not about whether marijuana is good or not for society.

If you didn’t see in the SacBee, there are now 108 locations within the City of Sacramento with a commercial cannabis permit in process. This means there are at least 108 planned legal grow operations. The largest cluster is in an industrial section off Power Inn Road, but there are quite a few in North Sacramento too.

The situation: I appraised a house on Eldridge Avenue in Sacramento a few weeks back and I discovered there are three commercial cannabis cultivation permits on file with the city one street to the south. This is a residential area, but it’s next to industrial properties.

On Kathleen Avenue there are residential homes to the north and the “green zone” to the south. In many cases commercial grow operations will be far from residential homes, but not in every case as seen below.

Three things to consider about legal cannabis cultivation:

1) Neighborhood trends: Part of knowing the market and being a real estate expert is being in tune with what is happening in the neighborhood – even in the commercial sector. If you haven’t bookmarked the SacBee cannabis map, I recommend doing that. You can also see where marijuana dispensaries are located here.

2) Disclosure: Anyone who works in real estate needs to consider what disclosure looks like when we find out about cannabis grows nearby. I won’t tell anyone what to disclose or how to do it because that’s not my role, but knowing about commercial cannabis grow operations might be a good place to start. This is especially true in a situation like the one above where one side of the street is residential and the other side is industrial. This is a conversation that each appraisal firm and brokerage ought to have as the legal cannabis industry emerges. In my appraisal report on Eldridge Ave I simply disclosed my knowledge of three cannabis cultivation permits one street south of the subject property. Remember, it is illegal to have a commercial cannabis operation in a residential home, so disclosure is probably something we’ll think about more when there are nearby industrial properties. Moreover, it is only legal to grow commercially in the City of Sacramento as most other areas including Sacramento County have said NO to legal commercial grow operations (for now).

3) Value impact: Over time we’ll have to ask if there is a value impact due to proximity of cannabis cultivation businesses. Right now this is all so new and we are only seeing the beginning of an emerging industry take root in Sacramento. Keep in mind there are very strict guidelines for these businesses, and the City of Sacramento is putting rules in place to ensure neighborhoods and areas don’t “go to pot” so to speak (pun intended). There are rules for security, safety, proximity to schools, and even odor. In many cases these businesses could operate without any visible evidence at all. Though if there does end up being a problem with odor, crime, or stigma, then that’s something we’ll have to watch and consider. On a side note, it seems many of these grow operations so far are located in areas with lower property values. To be fair there may be more industrial properties in these locations, but this is still something to watch closely.

4) Other: What is #4?

Cannabis class I’m teaching: By the way, I’m teaching a class at SAR called “The emerging trend of marijuana in real estate” on August 30. I’ll talk for 60-75 minutes about zoning, land value, disclosures, etc… More details here.

Questions: Do nearby cannabis businesses need to be disclosed? What do you think we need to look for to know if there is any impact to value? Anything else to add? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

How do we value a brand new house in an old neighborhood?

By 10 Comments

What do we do with a brand new house in an old neighborhood? Can it sell for more? How much more? I’ve been asked several times about this lately, so I wanted to pitch in some thoughts. Anything to add?

Some things I would do and consider when valuing a new home:

1) Immediate neighborhood: In an ideal world I’ll find a few recent examples of brand new homes on nearby streets. But if not I would search through years worth of sales in the immediate neighborhood for something that was newer in age. Even if I found older sales from years ago, my goal would be to compare these brand new homes with other similar-sized older homes at the time. How much of a percentage price difference was there if any?

2) Surrounding market area: If there are no sales in the immediate neighborhood I’d search competitive areas in the surrounding market. Did buyers pay a price premium in other places? Remember, it might be easy to cherry pick “comps” from brand new subdivisions or infill projects, but that’s not really the same thing as being totally surrounded by older homes, right?

3) New development: Next I’d take a look at the premium for new construction in the surrounding local market. For example, two weeks ago someone asked me how to value a brand new home in an older part of West Sacramento. I recommended points 1 and 2, but also said it would be wise to look in the newer portions of West Sacramento to see what brand new homes are selling for compared to homes that are just 2-3 years old in the same development. The premium we see in the new subdivisions might not correlate perfectly with an older neighborhood, but it’s still data. For instance, imagine we found there was a 10% price premium for brand new homes in the new area. At the least that might help us decide not to apply a 20% price premium in the older neighborhood we’re working in. Know what I’m saying?

4) Price ceiling: It’s possible of course to build something magnificent that might sell for big money in some parts of town, but we cannot forget the reality of price ceilings. In other words, there is probably a price limit buyers are willing to pay in an area before moving on elsewhere. Where is that ceiling? That’s worth asking and researching.

5) The wrong one & modern homes: Just because something is brand new does not mean it’s going to fetch top dollar. If it’s the wrong type of house for the neighborhood, buyers might actually pay less for the property. It’s like when someone builds a plain earth-tone stucco tract home in a classic area with Tudors and Bungalows. Despite being new it might actually sell with a price discount if it doesn’t have any hint of era charm for the neighborhood. On the other hand there are modern homes popping up all over Sacramento and beyond that seem to defy this idea. These homes definitely don’t blend into the neighborhood at all in terms of design, but they’re still fetching high prices. Keep in mind though modern homes tend to carry wide appeal, so they are often able to break the mold of the neighborhood and still command a price premium because of their style. In short, modern homes are not vibeless tract homes, so it’s not really the same thing.

6) Other: What else would you add to this conversation?

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

Tips for talking with appraisers [WEBINAR]: This week I recorded a 20-minute webinar for real estate agents on tips for talking with appraisers. Check it out here (or below). Thanks Tina Mitchell for the invite to do this.

Questions: Anything else to add? What’s #6? What have you done when valuing that brand new home in an old area? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

When using older sales is the best option

By 15 Comments

Let’s talk about choosing comps. I want to share an example of what I did not long ago when there were no recent sales for a unique model in a tract subdivision. Anything to add? I’d love to hear your take.

The situation: The subject property is a larger single story home with a casita. In this case the builder built only a handful of homes with a casita, so comps would be limited. If you aren’t familiar with a casita, it’s a term used to refer to an extra housing unit or detached area. I find it’s often interchanged with “in-law unit” or “accessory dwelling”, but we have to remember an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) actually needs a sleeping area, bathroom, and kitchen to be an ADU. In this case the “casita” only has a bedroom and bathroom, so while it’s tempting to call it an accessory dwelling, it’s really not because there isn’t a kitchen.

The problem: There are zero recent casita sales, so it’s not easy to readily understand what the market is willing to pay for one of these units. What do we compare the casita unit with in today’s market? How do we adjust for it?

What I did: In an ideal world I would’ve had a nearby neighborhood with casita sales, but I didn’t find anything, so I chose to study the neighborhood market by researching three casita sales in the neighborhood over the past ten years. As long as the data was good, I would use research from sales in the past to help me value a property today.

Immediately I noticed the casita sales were clearly commanding a price premium. I thought that this might be the case, but it was still good to confirm instead of assume. Keep in mind if you don’t know how to graph, that’s okay. You can see the same thing when pulling a CMA or printing out sales. Here is a tutorial though in case you want to learn to make a graph like this.

The next thing I did was to research how the casita units compared with other specific models at the time of their sale. Being that most casita homes were somewhere around 2500 sq ft (without the casita), I wanted to see how these units competed with other homes that were around that size. The beauty of having three older sales was I could find what the price adjustment was in each of those situations compared to other specific models. This would prove valuable since I had three recent 2500 sq ft sales without a casita, and I would need to make a value adjustment for the casita in today’s market.

I won’t say exactly what my adjustment was, though maybe I will in the comments.

The big point: Sometimes we have to look back in time to understand how value works. Don’t be afraid to pour through many years of sales to help establish context. Spend time answering the question, “How does a property like this fit into the market?” We can do this by scouring years of sales in the immediate neighborhood, but we might also look to the surrounding market too for competitive locations. Of course just because we research sales that are many years old does not mean we will use them in a current valuation (or a listing presentation for agents). I really don’t have a problem with using older sales when appropriate because we can always make an adjustment depending on how the market has changed over time. But let’s remember FHA wants appraisers to use comps within 12 months, so I probably couldn’t get away with using a sale from three years ago in a lender appraisal. However, I could pull in research from the past to help support the value for what the casita is worth.

I hope this was helpful or interesting.

Questions: Anything else to add? Did I miss something? When have you used older sales to help see the context of value? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.