• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

  • About
  • Appraisals
  • Order
  • Ask Ryan
  • Areas
  • Classes
  • Press
  • Trends
  • Share
  • Contact

Starbucks cups and price per sq ft

April 18, 2016 By Ryan Lundquist 30 Comments

I was in line at Starbucks and then it hit me. The perfect analogy for price per sq ft in real estate. While ordering my Grande drip with no room, I began to wonder how much I was paying for each ounce. Maybe that means I’m a geek, but was I really getting the most bang for my buck to buy a Grande (medium)? Or should I go with a Venti (large)? Take a look at the image below to see how price per ounce works at Starbucks, and then let’s consider a real example of this principle in real estate.

Starbucks cups and real estate - by sacramento appraisal blog

Big Point: The larger the cup, the less you pay for each ounce of coffee. Or we could say it a different way. Smaller cups of coffee tend to cost more per ounce. This is interesting, but it’s not really surprising because it’s merely an example of economies of scale, right? We see this principle all the time when buying bigger or smaller items, yet it’s easy to ignore when it comes to housing. So let’s take a look at all residential home sales from last month in Sacramento County. Do you see a similarity with the coffee?

image purchased from 123rf by sacramento appraisal blog - price per sq ft example

Big Point: The larger the house, the less you tend to pay for each square foot. Or we could say it a different way. Smaller homes tend to have a higher price per sq ft compared to larger homes. This is a principle we see when looking at county-wide data, but it’s also something we tend to see by neighborhood (assuming we have enough data). Just like coffee costs less per ounce the more you buy, it tends to cost less per sq ft for the more house you buy. That’s the big idea.

Be a Great Explainer: I love this analogy. Maybe it’s partly because I’m a coffee fanboy, but in truth talking through price per sq ft is hands-down one of the most relevant conversations to master in real estate. I hope the next time the topic comes up with a client, maybe you’ll think about using Starbucks cups to explain how price per sq ft tends to work in a neighborhood. For a refresher post you can read 5 things to remember about using price per sq ft in real estate.

Question: What drink do you order at Starbucks?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Random Stuff, Resources Tagged With: appraisers, appraisers blog in sacramento, economies of scale, explaining real estate, Greater Sacramento appraisal blog, home appraisals, house appraisals, price per sq ft in real estate, Real Estate, Starbucks cups, using price per sq ft in real estate

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Joe Lynch says

    April 18, 2016 at 3:36 PM

    Wow, great analogy! I’m going to steal this with attribution….

    Next question: Is Starbucks Q4? Peets Q3? Temple Q2?

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 18, 2016 at 3:39 PM

      Thanks Joe. I’m so glad you’re on board with the analogy too. 🙂 I was excited when it came to me in line a few weeks ago. We can’t forget about Temple Coffee too.

      Reply
      • Matt The Mortgage Guy says

        April 19, 2016 at 10:16 AM

        Temple coffee is East Sacramento. Very pricey per sqft but worth it to those who pay the premium

        Reply
        • Ryan Lundquist says

          April 19, 2016 at 10:19 AM

          Now that’s a metaphor, Matt. Well played (and true). I think I paid $2.75 or so for a cup of coffee there a couple weeks ago. Their coffee is loaded with caffeine though, so it certainly does the trick.

          Reply
  2. Joe Lynch says

    April 18, 2016 at 3:39 PM

    You might want to add something about fixed costs vs. variable costs for why PSF tends to go down for larger homes. Same applies to coffee-fixed costs are large (site, power, etc.) while variable costs are low (cost of coffee grounds).

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 18, 2016 at 3:43 PM

      That would be good, though you just said it, so there it is. Thanks Joe. Like any good post, so much value is found in the comments, so I appreciate your take. There is honestly so much that could be said in each blog post. I find it’s important to be selective and just leave room for comments and exploring ideas and issues in conversation and future posts. I have one friend who emails me after some of my posts to say, “Dang Ryan, that was way too long.” In his honor this post was written. #shortandsweet 🙂

      Reply
  3. Shannon Slater says

    April 18, 2016 at 3:56 PM

    Love this analogy! I think that it is one the many could understand. The same would apply to valuing land. The larger the lot, the smaller the price per square foot or price per acre. Of course, as a fellow coffee lover, I really like it. Thanks! 🙂

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 18, 2016 at 4:14 PM

      Thanks Shannon. Excellent point on price per sq ft per acre. I’m so glad you mentioned that.

      Reply
  4. Mike Turner says

    April 18, 2016 at 5:18 PM

    Just for fun: The correct coffee size is small!

    http://domesticity.gawker.com/the-correct-coffee-size-is-small-1638084505

    And, here’s an analogy to go along: A smaller house may be better:

    http://www.thesimpledollar.com/why-you-should-buy-less-house-than-you-can-afford/

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 18, 2016 at 5:41 PM

      Thanks Mike. Classic coffee article. I appreciate it. Speaking of small houses, I just finished up a show on Netflix called Tiny House Builders. It’s amazing how much utility you can find in a smaller space. I’m not about to try living in 128 sq ft, but I find it intriguing nonetheless.

      Reply
  5. Gary Kristensen says

    April 18, 2016 at 10:55 PM

    Home run analogy Ryan. The Law of Diminishing Returns is alive and well in real estate and coffee.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 19, 2016 at 6:24 AM

      Thanks Gary. Yes indeed my friend.

      Reply
  6. Tom Molinari says

    April 19, 2016 at 6:48 AM

    Great analogy for explaining why larger homes (or larger lots) sell at a lower price per unit. Another way of looking at the data is the marginal cost for each additional ounce. The first 12 ounces sell for $0.16 per ounce. The next four ounces are priced at $0.075 per ounce. The next 8 ounces are priced at $0.025 per ounce. As Gary pointed out above, the law of diminishing returns. A great way to explain to the layman how you developed lot size adjustments or a simple GLA adjustment.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM

      Tom, I love it. Thanks for the different look at things. Very useful. I think sometimes it’s easy to look at something that is twice the size and think it is worth twice as much, though it’s simply not how it works in many cases.

      Reply
  7. Steven R Wik says

    April 19, 2016 at 9:10 AM

    Great analogy to help people understand value to size. And since you asked for the Starbucks order I may never order again as my .38 each K Cups I tried for a 12 oz pour is .03 per ounce. Never really compared at that level it till now, no more Starbucks for me 🙂

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 19, 2016 at 9:28 AM

      Thanks Steven. You know, we do really have to count the cost to what we are spending on coffee and lunch and such. I definitely buy coffee every week because I’m a fan, though at the same time I’m careful to not buy too much (or every day as much as I’d like). It starts to add up if we’re not careful. It’s amazing how buying coffee every day or eating lunch out really adds up over time. Just $10 per day (M to F) can be $200 per month and then $2400 for the year.

      Reply
  8. Wendell Browne says

    April 19, 2016 at 9:21 AM

    Good stuff, Ryan. The article and Starbucks that is ?

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM

      Thanks Wendell. Speaking of coffee, it’s time for a refill.

      Reply
  9. Jeff Grenz says

    April 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM

    Great analogy. A mix of fixed costs and variable… but they’ve adjusted them to market. They are charging somewhere over $1.. $1.25-$1.35 for service, pour and cup and 5-6 cents per oz for the coffee.

    Buy a home and you pay $____ for the lot, permit, connections (mostly location costs) and $50-200 per foot for the house on top depending on condition…. Older neighborhoods the value of the remaining construction, especially if neglected is smaller than most buyers understand and the location costs is much higher.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM

      Fantastic, Jeff. I appreciate your breakdown of coffee and real estate. I know you bring a unique angle in light of your building background too.

      Reply
      • Jeff Grenz says

        April 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM

        I was going to use 45th x M in East Sac as an example but couldn’t find a current comp … but then got a new listing email for something newer near by… $2.5 mil for 5800 sf @ 1441 40th… about $1mil for the lot, existing connections and permits & $250 for the freshly remodeled home. New construction for this level of home is likely $300-400 per foot, but sight unseen it could be more.

        Reply
        • Ryan Lundquist says

          April 19, 2016 at 10:15 AM

          Nice example (and nice street). That’s one of the big ones for sure. I just ran some Fab 40s graphs yesterday actually.

          Reply
  10. Matt The Mortgage Guy says

    April 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM

    Great analogy and I not only enjoyed the article but all the insightful comments as well. Keep up the great work my man!

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 19, 2016 at 10:39 AM

      Thanks Matt. I appreciate it. I’m enjoying all the comments too. Comments often take a post to a whole different level. Thanks everyone.

      Reply
  11. Chris Tuttle says

    April 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM

    Hello Ryan,
    I’m new at this real estate investing and I want to learn from as many resources as possible. Love to read the comments and I’m sure I will be investing in the SAC area eventually being that I live just north of you in Redding. Thanks for the post, great example. As I start this journey I decided to build a website around real estate investing. http://reddingrealestatepros.com/
    I have lots of work to do.
    Thanks again.

    Chris Tuttle

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      April 22, 2016 at 12:20 PM

      Hi Chris. Thanks for reaching out. Congrats on the adventure of real estate investing. Keep me posted if you have any questions or insight. I look forward to hearing how things go for you.

      Reply
  12. Tom Horn says

    May 7, 2016 at 4:52 AM

    Great analogy Ryan. It’s so simple but sometimes we forget to carry over that basic economic principle to other things like housing. Something else others may want to consider is what happens when you start adding extras. When you make that coffee a Mocha or a Cappuccino then the pricer per unit will change and vary similar to adding additional features to your home like a finished basement or granite counters instead of laminate. Just some food for thought.

    Reply
    • Ryan Lundquist says

      May 7, 2016 at 8:59 AM

      Thank you so much Tom. I’ve not compared the price of lattes or mochas. I would be curious to see if they keep their pricing at a similar rate of change as drip coffee per ounce. Next post. Starbucks Salted Caramel Macchiatos and Price Per Sq Ft (kidding).

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. The Problems with the Price Per Square Foot Method - DW Slater Appraisal Blog says:
    March 1, 2019 at 6:58 AM

    […] that many of you can relate to is from appraiser Ryan Lundquist as he used the analogy for Starbucks and the price per square foot–the price per ounce differences in the Tall, Venti and Grande at Starbucks diminish as the […]

    Reply
  2. If You Price Your Home Like Fro-Yo, You’re Gonna Get Licked! – Cleveland Appraisal Blog says:
    March 27, 2019 at 3:25 AM

    […] Starbucks cups and price per sq ft – Sacramento Appraisal Blog […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Ryan

 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Instagram

Subscribe to Weekly Post

* indicates required

Search this site

Blog Categories

  • Appraisal Stuff (407)
  • Bankruptcy (3)
  • Divorce (4)
  • Estate Settlement (6)
  • FHA Appraisal Articles (56)
  • Internet (53)
  • Market Trends (482)
  • Photos from the Field (126)
  • Property Taxes (70)
  • Random Stuff (231)
  • Resources (566)
  • Videos (161)

Blog Archives: 2009 – 2021

Lundquist Appraisal Links

  • Appraisal Order Form
  • Appraisal Website
  • Rancho Cordova Appraiser Website
  • Sacramento Appraisal Blog Sitemap
  • Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser Facebook Page
  • Twitter: Sacramento Appraiser (@SacAppraiser)
  • YouTube: Sacramento Appraiser Channel

Most Recent Posts

  • How much have prices risen since the bottom of the market?
  • How long can this market keep going?
  • What is your housing persona?
  • Rapid price growth & the Gilmore Girls next door
  • Are first-time buyers targeting 2-4 unit properties?
  • Stale real estate headlines & buyers flocking to El Dorado County
  • My new sewer line adds huge value, right?
  • The housing market nobody predicted
  • Real estate trends to watch in 2021
  • You carried me & a spreadsheet for Christmas

Disclaimer

First off, thank you for being here. Now let's get into the fine print. The material and information contained on this website is the copyrighted property of Ryan Lundquist and Lundquist Appraisal Company. Content on this website may not be reproduced or republished without prior written permission from Ryan Lundquist.

Please see my Sharing Policy on the navigation bar if you are interested in sharing portions of any content on this blog.

The information on this website is meant entirely for educational purposes and is not intended in any way to support an opinion of value for your appraisal needs or any sort of value conclusion for a loan, litigation, tax appeal or any other potential real estate or non-real estate purpose. The material found on this website is meant for casual reading only and is not intended for use in a court of law or any other legal use. Ryan will not appear in court in any capacity based on any information posted here. For more detailed market analysis to be used for an appraisal report or any appraisal-related purpose or valuation consulting, please contact Ryan at 916-595-3735 for more information.

There are no affiliate links on this blog, but there are three advertisements. Please do your homework before doing business with any advertisers as advertisements are not affiliated with this blog in any way. Two ads are located on the sidebar and one is at the bottom of each post. The ads earn a minor amount of revenue and are a simple reward for providing consistent original content to readers. If you think the ads interfere with your blog experience or the integrity of the blog somehow, let me know. I'm always open to feedback. Thank you again for being here.

Copyright © 2021 Sacramento Appraisal Blog