You can make numbers say whatever you want in real estate. Sometimes this happens on purpose, but other times it’s an accident. That’s why it’s so important to know how to make the right comparisons. Below I will show you an example of how you can look at the numbers and end up saying two completely different things about the market. Both might be technically true, yet one of the statements really doesn’t reflect the real trend. In an era of big data in real estate, knowing how to communicate these things to clients is key. Enjoy.

THE WRONG COMPARISON: (Volume is down by 30%)

When we compare January with December, it’s easy to get an inaccurate picture of the market (but it happens all the time in media outlets). In the case above, we see a 30% decline, and this sounds very alarming. Yet volume from December to January almost always decreases by 20-25% easily in any given year in Sacramento, so 30% in not something to freak out about.
Truth: Comparing the previous month to the current month can sometimes give us the wrong picture about the market – especially in the midst of a strong seasonal trend. Volume is ALWAYS lower in January (see this quick graph as proof).
THE RIGHT COMPARISON: (Volume is down by 4.5%)
When we compare January 2015 with January 2014, we see sales volume was down by only 4.5% this year. That’s a far cry from sounding the alarm that “VOLUME IS DOWN BY 30%”. In this case the most accurate thing we can say about the market is that volume was 4.5% lower this January.
Truth: Comparing the current month to the same month last year tends to give us important insight because we are using the same context for comparison. I’m not saying to not compare back-to-back months, but only to get in the habit of looking at the same month last year too. This is especially important when dealing with January and February data since they are typically slower months in terms of closed escrows. Remember too that last month’s sales tell us what the market used to be like when these properties went into contract 30-60+ days ago, but current listings and pendings tell us about the market right now.
Questions: Any thoughts or insight? I’d love to hear your take.
If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.




Quality: The quality of the addition is going to be a huge factor in whether buyers pay more or less for an addition without permits. Does it feel like the rest of the house? Does it have a real use? Does it have a permanent heat source? Is it something buyers actually want in the neighborhood market? Is the workmanship decent or shoddy? Buyers may also consider how much it would cost to get the area permitted.
Unpermitted Additions are a big grey area when it comes to financing. There are so many different factors and people that come into play that make them difficult. Because of this many lenders will just say no. I have seen unpermitted additions obtain financing, but only if the appraiser is well qualified and writes a good report as to why. The appraiser will have to sell the reason to include it, and most of the time you will never get the full square footage value for the addition. Questions to ask when you have a property with an unpermitted addition: Does it make sense? Does it conform to the area? Does the addition actually add value to the property? Does it look like the rest of the house, or can you tell it was an addition? So be nice to the appraisers. I can say if you want the unpermitted addition to count for value or qualify for financing, it will come down to what they say in the report.

Choosing the Wrong Comps: The image to the right shows “nearby similar sales”, but these sales are single family detached homes, and NOT attached townhouses. When there are no recent sales in a townhouse subdivision, it doesn’t mean you should borrow from the single family detached market. Either you can use VERY old townhouse sales in the same subdivision, or maybe find a competitive complex somewhere in the market area. Again, it’s easy to cut Zillow some slack here since they might not know the units are attached, but even in that case the TINY lot size and history of sales should be given much stronger weight then.