Sacramento Home Appraiser

How do you know how much the market has gone up?

July 24, 2019 By Ryan Lundquist 19 Comments

I’ve been getting this question quite a bit lately. How much has the market gone up? How do you figure that out exactly? This is something we consider all the time when pulling comps, which is why it’s so important. Let’s talk about it.

NOTE: This post is longer because there’s lots to say. You can still skim the bold headings though if you wish.

Here are a few simple things I do to gauge value changes:

1) Look for comps: The best thing we can do is look to the comps for the answers. More specifically, look for the price difference between sales in the past compared with properties that are currently getting into contract.

To gauge a change in value I recommend comparing similar properties from the past to similar properties now. This is often done with sales from last year vs this year, but here’s an example of several years ago with this year. If you’re in a tract neighborhood you might consider comparing a few different similar-sized models from the past with those same models today. If you’re not in a tract area, just compare competitive sales from the past with competitive sales today.

In this example above I looked up a 2,734 sq ft model in South Sacramento and in 2015 this model was selling for about $330,000 while today the most recent sales have been $400,000 (backs highway) and $412,000. There is a pending at $419,126. Ultimately we could say the market has gone up by $80,000 to $90,000 or about 24% to 27%. It might seem odd that I’m looking up 2015 sales, but in this case the subject property sold in 2015, so I was attempting to figure out how much the market changed since then.

When lining up all data from 2018 through 2019 it’s really clear we’ve seen price increases, right?

2) Sales last year & this year: We can also try to find some sales that sold last year and then re-sold this year. I realize if we’re lucky we might find only one or two examples at best. I’m not talking about flips where remodeling has occurred, but an example like the one below where it sold in the exact same condition.

In this example we see the market has shown about a 2% uptick in value over the past year. Of course we have to understand whether these sales sold at reasonable levels. After all, if either sold too high or too low, then it’s probably meaningless data. Ultimately sales like this can be clues into the market (more on this below too).

3) Stats programs: Some people might use fancy excel spreadsheet programs where competitive neighborhood data can be exported to show price changes over time. I don’t personally use something like this, but it’s not a bad idea if it helps you get a good picture of a neighborhood market. If you use something like this, please comment below.

4) Create visuals: I’m a visual guy and it helps me see the market by creating visuals. I find myself spending a good chunk of time on #1 and #2 above as I’m pulling comps, but I also use this step to compliment those steps. If you want to learn to make graphs, here’s a tutorial. If you’ve been thinking about this, why not go for it? Creating images has been revolutionary for the way I see the market and explain it.

CLOSING TIPS:

1) Be careful about zip code data: If you’re pulling data from a zip code or county, just remember trends shown in a larger area may or may not apply equally to every neighborhood or price range (or property type). This is why I don’t look at my recent big market update, see price metrics are up 3-4% this year in the region, and then use that number for every neighborhood. Nope. I advise knowing the larger trend very well, but don’t impose that trend on a smaller area without doing research.

2) Not just one example: It’s dangerous to base a value conclusion on only one example. This is why I wouldn’t look at my example in number two above and definitely state the market has increased by 2%. One example is best considered a piece of the puzzle, and it’s important to find other pieces before understanding the puzzle.

3) The stock market & competitive data: In the stock market you can have different stocks going up, down, and sideways all at once. The same thing happens in real estate. This is exactly why I strongly recommend you look at competitive data in neighborhoods. For example, if you are valuing a 1,200 sq ft house, make sure you are looking at examples of similar-sized homes to understand that market segment instead of 4,000 sq ft homes in the same neighborhood. Otherwise if I only look at larger homes that might be a little more stagnant, I could miss the fact that the bottom of the market is increasing much more rapidly than the top end.

4) Declining market: It’s been years since we’ve had a declining market, but this same methodology above can help you measure the market when prices are declining too.

5) Seasons: When looking at older sales let’s remember the seasons in which they sold. Thus last year I might give a 2% adjustment in a neighborhood for a property that sold in June, but I could give a 5% adjustment for something that closed in December because it sold when the market was down further during a dull fall season.

6) Being quick & reconciliation: There’s not just one way to do this, and there aren’t quick answers. We have to dig in. Most of all, we might choose a few different ways to study the market and then reconcile our findings. What I mean is I might do all of the steps above, get slightly different answers for each step, and then piece them all together (reconcile them) when I use a comp in a report and make a specific adjustment to that comp. In other words, if I adjust a comp up by 2% or 4% or whatever the number is, I’m coming to the table with some sort of rationale or support for why that adjustment makes sense.

I hope this was helpful.

MARKET UPDATE VIDEO: Here’s a video to walk through the growing and slowing market in Sacramento. Enjoy if you wish.

Questions: What do you think of the steps above? Anything else you’d add? What do you do?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

How do we value a house with a HUGE non-permitted addition?

February 5, 2019 By Ryan Lundquist 26 Comments

What do appraisers do when there is an enormous non-permitted addition? Imagine a 1,300 sq ft house with a 1,000 sq ft addition. What the? Let’s talk about this.

Here are some things to consider:

THE SHORT VERSION:

A lack of permits causes uncertainty in real estate
Buyers usually expect a price discount
Appraisers need to think through many issues when there aren’t permits
Many appraisers are likely to use the original footprint when choosing comps (instead of blindly lumping in the extra space)
This is a complicated issue, which is why the post is longer

THE LONGER VERSION:

1) Uncertainty: Whenever a home has a substantial non-permitted addition, it’s like infusing the property with uncertainty. What I mean is every time a person does a refinance or sells, the lack of permits might not be seen the same way by buyers, lenders, real estate agents, and appraisers. So just because it sold without any problems in the past doesn’t mean it will sell without hiccups in the future. In short, people who buy homes like this need to understand they’re signing up for a future of uncertain escrows.

2) Expectation of a discount: My sense is most buyers are going to expect a price discount when there aren’t permits. I know, thanks Captain Obvious. Granted, in some areas a lack of permits might be normal, but in other places or price ranges a lack of permits can be a huge deal. If a house was increased from 1,300 sq ft to 2,300 sq ft though without permits, that’s a 77% change in size. I’d say that’s no small matter for marketability, so buyers aren’t likely to be okay with paying full price. On top of this, some lenders might not want to touch the property either. Anyway, I’d expect to see buyers wanting a discount, but technically I’m open to seeing otherwise because my job is to be objective rather than impose a rule that says, “Buyers will always pay less in this situation.”

3) Nuts and bolts: Appraisers have to ask whether an addition is legal based on zoning. If it’s flat-out illegal, the appraiser isn’t going to be recognizing value (or shouldn’t be). Keep in mind sometimes lenders instruct appraisers not to show value for non-permitted space. At the same time many lenders ask appraisers to simply support the value if the appraiser is assigning value to non-permitted features. In other words, lenders might say, “We’re cool if you give value to this, but support the value with comps or data.” I wrote more about some of the nuts and bolts of the problem of non-permitted additions here.

4) Assuming it’s no big deal: An appraiser could assume the market would pay the same amount for a 2,300 sq ft house compared to a 1,300 sq ft house with a 1,000 sq ft addition, but that’s a gigantic assumption. In my mind it would be a huge liability for an appraiser to blindly assume the market would have no problem and just appraise it like this was no big deal. There is simply too much uncertainty, so appraisers aren’t likely to walk out on a limb of liability like this without compelling data. In many cases buyers will ignore smaller-ticket items that aren’t permitted, but a 1,000 sq ft addition is a massive issue that cannot be ignored.

5) A starting place: In an ideal world it would be best to find comps that also have large non-permitted additions. That would be incredible, but there’s a fat chance of that happening. So an appraiser has to decide which course to take. Should the appraiser choose 1,300 sq ft comps or 2,300 sq ft comps? There isn’t just one answer here, so I’ll let my colleagues speak to what they would do, but I would personally be extremely hesitant to use 2,300 sq ft homes unless there was a really good reason to do so. When an addition is so large like this, there are too many unknown factors about the quality of work and whether things were done right, so I’d more likely use 1,300 sq ft comps and then treat the non-permitted area separately. In other words, I’d get a really clear sense of what the house would be worth at 1,300 sq ft and then figure out the value of the addition and adjust for that in my report if needed. Yet I would be asking what 2,300 sq ft homes are selling for too, and I would probably view that price level as the very top of what a property like this could be worth.

6) Previous sales: One thing I would look for is if this property sold on the open market in the past. If it sold more recently a few times at 2,300 sq ft and the market seemed to recognize this space as square footage (despite a lack of permits), that might be data for me to consider. In that case I might be more tempted to choose 2,300 sq ft comps while making some very heavy disclaimers about there being no permits. But if I only have one previous sale from 2005 when lending standards were loose and lots of properties sold at inflated levels, I’d probably give very little or no weight to that prior sale. The truth is we might look up previous sales and see the opposite too. Maybe a property is huge on paper, but that doesn’t mean buyers paid a huge price. Thus we might see proof in previous sales that buyers didn’t consider this house on the same level as other 2,300 sq ft homes. Here’s the thing though. No matter how the market responded in the past, it doesn’t mean the market would look at the property the same today. Moreover, what if fraud or incompetence was involved in the prior sales? Thus prior sales can be valuable, but at the end of the day I have to still make a judgment call about today.

7) Multiple offers: If this property was listed on the open market and there were ten offers when buyers were informed about a lack of permits, that might mean something. Offers aren’t sales, but it’s still data to consider. Yet if a property has been really attractive to buyers but it keeps falling out of escrow because of a substantial non-permitted addition, that’s also telling. So just because something is appealing and getting offers doesn’t necessarily mean value is there. If buyers are struggling to close, that’s probably more telling than initial offers, right?

8) It’s a puzzle: Properties like this are like a puzzle. I have to look at many factors and assemble the pieces together. So I’ll give strong weight to 1,300 sq ft comps, I’ll maybe use some 2,300 sq ft comps and adjust down if necessary, and I’ll do my best to find some other comps with permit issues. Additionally, if I get a sense of what it would cost to permit the area, that’s at least worth considering and it might help me come up with some sort of adjustment down. My knee-jerk reaction is to think buyers at the least would deduct the cost to get it permitted (and realistically probably more). Lastly, I’d interview lots of agents and talk with appraiser colleagues too. This would help me sharpen my focus, give ideas for how to approach the property, or maybe even shed light on comps.

It’s not the appraiser’s fault: I know it’s frustrating to not give a quick solution for valuing a property like this, but there isn’t one. Let’s remember the uncertainty in valuing only exists because someone didn’t get permits.

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

BLOG BASH: My blog turns ten this month and I thought it would be fun to get some people together. I reserved a private room at Yolo Brewing Company from 3-7pm on March 2nd, and I’d be honored if you would show up. My wife and I will buy the first 100 beers and I’ll be doing some woodworking giveaways too. This is a laid-back event. No pressure at all. It’s okay if we’ve never met before too. You can RSVP on Facebook or just let me know by email.

Questions: What would you do in this situation? 1,300 sq ft comps or 2,300 sq ft comps? Anything to add?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Real estate trends to watch in 2019

January 3, 2019 By Ryan Lundquist 20 Comments

What’s the real estate market going to do in 2019? Let’s talk about some of the bigger emerging trends in Sacramento and beyond. You can quickly scroll or spend a few minutes digesting things. Anything to add?

TRENDS TO WATCH IN 2019:

Affordability: We’ve had seven years of price increases without dramatic wage growth, so it’s no surprise one of the most pressing issues today is affordability. This is true for buying and renting.

Buyers gain power: It’s been a sellers’ market for years, but buyers have been gaining more power as price growth has slowed. Unless we see something happen to reverse the slowing, I expect buyers will continue to gain more power this year. If sales volume persists to slump, then it will turn into a full-fledged buyers’ market.

Uncertainty about future: For the past two quarters we’ve watched sales volume slough in many markets throughout the country. Was this simply a dull year or is it something more? Buyers seemed to take their foot off the gas pedal. Will they step back on? That’s the big question, and we’ll have to watch closely over the next two to three months to know how the market is going to unfold.

This is a poll I ran on Twitter yesterday. I know it’s only one random sampling, but it reminds me of an uncertain vibe I’ve noticed. When I ask people what they think the market is going to do I get quite a few, “I’m really not sure” answers. It seems like many people are floating the idea the market could be flat or experience something very modest – whether up or down.

Mortgage companies merge: In 2018 we saw some mortgage companies merge as a way to hold on in this market, and I expect we’ll see more of that in coming time. The reality is certain companies are struggling because the refinance market died off and sales volume was weaker last year.

Color: The word on the street is we’ll keep seeing color complimenting gray. For reference, the Pantone color of the year is Living Coral. I’m not saying this orange-ish shade is going to be splashed everywhere, but maybe we’ll see it at some point. In 2016 the color of the year was a shade of blue, and we’ve certainly noticed blue in kitchens. I suppose the color of the year could be like the cerulean belt scene in The Devil Wears Prada where we mock the color until years down the road we realize we’re actually wearing it… Not that I wear cerulean belts.

Looking for an exit: Some homeowners are concerned about a “bubble” and they sense the top is near, so they’ll be looking to exit “before it’s too late.” This doesn’t represent everyone, but some have been waiting for the right time to list and they’re feeling more ready. I expect this will be more pronounced for those in a place to downsize or move out of state. The struggle for others is it’s expensive to sell and buy again in the same market, so it becomes easier to stay put. For locals, I’d watch for Bay Area migration to Sacramento as the dream is to exit a higher-priced market and purchase in a lower-priced area. And Texas, we are the “Bay Area” buyers to you.

Overpricing: Sellers struggled with overpricing in 2018 and I expect they’ll continue to struggle – though hopefully not as much. It’s normal to see sellers want to price higher, but the problem lately has been sellers pricing for a more aggressive market from the past instead of today’s slower market. And of course sellers have been aiming for “unicorn” buyers instead of real buyers.

Laws for Cannabis: Recreational cannabis is now legal in 10 states and medicinal use is legal in more than 20 additional states. Whether you like it or not, this is a trend, and we’re bound to see more states jump on board as cannabis is normalized. I don’t say this as an advocate, but as an observer paying attention to potential impacts to the real estate market. Locally I’m expecting at some point to see other cities besides Sacramento change their zoning code to allow commercial cannabis cultivation. Think about it this way too. With so much talk of a coming recession, it’s hard to imagine city councils are not considering this move to secure future tax revenue.

Emergence of concessions: Sellers have been in the driver’s seat for years, so they haven’t been in the habit of giving credits to buyers or offering concessions, but this year could be different as buyers presumably gain more power. Sellers are going to have to get used to the idea that they won’t have multiple offers on every deal and they might have to offer credits, make repairs, etc… to get escrows closed.

Smart homes: As Wi-Fi doorbells, security cameras, smart thermostats, and voice-activated light bulbs become common, we’re only going to see more “smart” features in homes.

Energy efficient construction: Green is all the rage and we’re seeing laws change to usher in more energy-efficient technology. For instance, in 2020 in California solar panels are going to be required on roofs for new construction.

Flipping seminars: There will be no shortage of celebrity flipping seminars this year to teach the “secrets” of getting rich in real estate.

Pickier buyers: Buyers are patient about finding the right house, they’re more informed than ever about price trends, and they have higher expectations about condition and location. In a market where buyers seem poised to gain power, it only makes sense to see them grow more finicky as they have a greater selection of homes to choose from.

Crowded for real estate pros: We’ve seen explosive growth in the number of real estate professionals. This makes for a crowded and competitive market – especially in light of slumping volume. I’d expect 2019 to begin to weed some people out of the market if there isn’t enough pie to feed everyone.

Getting rid of appraisers: Over the past couple years we’ve seen an increase in appraisal waivers and there is currently a move to not require appraisals under a certain threshold. There is a clear agenda to start using “evaluations” instead of traditional appraisals. This is a big deal and removing one of the systems of checks and balances (the appraisal) as the market slows might not be the best idea ever… Read more here.

Creative financing: Last but not least, underwriting has been strict for years, but lenders are feeling the sting of the refinance market drying and sluggish sales volume. Do you think there might be more pressure to loosen lending standards to help fuel more business? Right now lenders hold tremendous power and what they do in coming time can shape the next few years. If they help buyers artificially afford higher prices through creative financing, that can only inspire price growth or stall the slowing trend. Sounds healthy, right?

I hope that was helpful or interesting.

Questions: What else do you think will be important in 2019? Did I miss something? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

An underrated metric & slumping volume

December 12, 2018 By Ryan Lundquist 24 Comments

There’s a stat that doesn’t get much love. It’s not sexy, nobody really writes about it in the newspapers, and most people don’t even know what it is. But it’s really important because it helps us tell how hot or cool the market is. I’m talking about the sales to list price ratio. Oops, did I lose you? I know, a topic like this sounds painful, but let’s consider why this actually matters. Then if you’re interested I have a huge local market update below to discuss slumping volume and slowing momentum. Any thoughts?

What is it? The sales price to original list price ratio is one of the best ways to gauge the temperature of the market. It’s the relationship between the final sales price and the original list price, and it’s expressed as a percentage.

If we only had one stat: We could likely get a pretty good understanding of how hot or cold a market is based on this metric alone. So without looking at price, inventory, or sales volume, if we simply saw a market had a 100% sales to original list price ratio, it tells us properties on average are selling for what they listed for. That’s a sign the market is hot or at least buyers are willing to pay what sellers are putting out there.

When we see this ratio moving up or down, it helps us get an idea of what the market is doing. For instance, over the past six months the sales price to original list price ratio has declined in Sacramento County, which tells us the gap has been growing between what sellers are asking and what they are actually getting. The most recent ratio is 96%, and that means on average properties are selling 4% lower than their original list price. That’s a powerful stat, right?

Not being anal, but ORIGINAL matters: It can make a huge difference if we’re looking at the original list price or the most recent list price.

Looking at the most recent list price makes it seem like the market isn’t cooling all that much. After all, a 99% sales to list price ratio still sounds pretty good. Yet this stat hides the real trend that properties on average are actually selling 4% lower than their original price. Thus if we’re not careful we can totally misunderstand the market despite good intentions. That’s sobering, right?

The “Bubble” years:

Right now 96% feels dull, but imagine 87%. Yikes!

Action Step: With so much talk about the market softening these days, it’s a good idea to pay attention to lots of different metrics – and especially the sales to original list price ratio. Keep in mind if the ratio isn’t available through MLS, it can always be run manually by dividing the final sales price into the original list price. For instance, all sales in Sacramento County this month totaled $512M while the original list price for all these sales totaled $533M. When I divide $512M into $533M I get 0.96 (or 96%).

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

—–——– Big local monthly market update (long on purpose) —–——–

Dull is a perfect word to describe this fall season. Actually really dull would be more accurate. Let’s consider some of the bigger themes happening right now in the market.

DOWNLOAD GRAPHS FOR YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA: Please download all graphs here as a zip file. See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy my post verbatim).

A week longer: It’s been taking about a week longer to sell this year compared to last year in the region (technically 8 days).

Prices softening: Prices normally soften during the fall season. If you don’t believe me, look at the graphs below. This year the median price is down by 6% from the height of summer in the region. This doesn’t mean every neighborhood or price range is down by that much, but there is a more defined softening present this year in many price ranges. Sellers would be wise to price according to listings that are getting into contract rather than the highest sales from spring.

Sales volume slumping (please read): Sales volume is only down by 3% in the region this year, but the bigger stat is volume is down 11% over the past four months. This is definitely something we need to watch closely to see how it unfolds. In short, if volume rebounds to normal levels as 2019 begins, then we’ll chalk this slump up to a dull fall season like we had in 2014. If volume persists to decline though we’ll correctly call this a new direction for the market. So is this seasonal or not? I’ll tell you in a few months or so….

Momentum change: The rate of price changes has slowed lately. What I mean is in years past we’d regularly see 7-10% price increases when running stats, but over the past few months we’re starting to see only 2-6% increases instead. I talked about this last month, and the new stats show this same trend.

Ironic power exchange: There has been a power exchange lately where buyers have been gaining market share and sellers have been losing it. Of course we know sellers have struggled with being out of touch with the market as they’ve been prone to overprice. It’s been easy to point this out all year long, but ironically we’re starting to see something similar with some buyers thinking they’re completely running the show when in fact it’s not quite a full-fledged Buyers’ market.

I could write more, but let’s get visual instead.

BIG QUESTIONS:

1) How did the market change from last year?