Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

Square footage

The skinny on accessory dwelling units

By 27 Comments

I’ve been getting a ton of questions lately about accessory dwelling units, so I wanted to talk through some of the bigger issues. Skim to questions that sound interesting or take some time to read. Enjoy if you wish.

What is an accessory dwelling unit (ADU)?
There are lots of definitions out there. In short, an ADU is typically a detached or attached dwelling unit meant for independent living, so it includes a sleeping area, bathroom, and cooking area. California, Sacramento County, and other areas may describe ADUs a little differently. 

If a unit doesn’t have a kitchen is it an ADU?
An ADU must have a cooking area. Otherwise we’d call it something else. Personally I’d probably call it a casita, but that’s just me. Anyway, if a builder constructs an “ADU” and it only has a bedroom and bathroom without a kitchen, we just wouldn’t call it an accessory dwelling. 

WEEKLY MARKET UPDATE: By the way, here’s my weekly video market update called Why aren’t home prices dropping? Watch below or here.

Is my pool house an ADU?
Probably not. Remember, if the pool house doesn’t have a kitchen, bathroom, and there is no sleeping area, it clearly doesn’t qualify as an ADU. I think sometimes if we step back and recognize we’re calling something a “pool house” too, that’s probably a clue that it’s something else.

What other words are used to describe an ADU?
There are countless words such as granny flat, casita, in-law quarters, mother-in-law apartment, garage apartment, etc… This could vary from market to market and person to person.

Is it okay to lump the square footage of the accessory unit into the square footage of the main house?
No. This happens all the time in real estate listings, but if you have to step outside the house into something else, it’s really not proper to include that other space in the square footage of the main house per ANSI standards. Think about it logically too. Imagine a 1,600 sq ft home with a 400 sq ft ADU. Is this really a 2,000 sq ft house? Nope. Maybe the market will pay the same price as other 2000 sq ft homes, but that’s beside the point because we’re fundamentally dealing with a smaller home with an ADU rather than one larger home. These are two different things, right? The problem becomes if we only choose 2,000 sq ft comps we haven’t really proved what a 1,600 sq ft home with an ADU is worth.

What if the square footage in a listing includes the ADU?
We see this quite a bit. I get it because the listing is advertising the total size of all structures on the lot. I just hope there is an asterisk or explanation somewhere in the listing that the square footage represents both the house and the accessory unit. This is important for clarity, maybe liability, and it helps appraisers be more informed when choosing comps. In short, just because it’s listed a certain way in MLS doesn’t mean the market or appraisers will recognize all the space as gross living area.

What if Tax Records shows the ADU in the square footage?
That happens. But just because Tax Records shows the property as 2,000 sq ft doesn’t mean that is what is legal or the way the market sees the units. If you want to know what is permitted it’s probably a good idea to rely on the building department (and hopefully they have good records).

It’s an ADU because it looks like one, right?
It’s key to understand what something is. I recall a unit permitted as a residential office even though it looked like a full-fledged second living space. It had a kitchen, bedroom, and bathroom, but the one thing it lacked was a permit to be an ADU and to be rented. This is where permits matter greatly. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck…. Well, it’s not always a duck when it comes to being an accessory unit. An owner might say, “This was fully permitted.” But the real question is, “What was it permitted as?”

How do you value a property with an accessory unit?
That’s a big question. I wrote a separate post about that. In short, I would look at it like a puzzle and consider lots of factors including comps, rental income, and lots of other logical points. 

How many accessory units can one property have in California?
On a single family lot you are allowed one ADU unit as well as one JADU (Junior Accessory Unit at 500 sq ft max). Here is an informative piece from CA for Homes. Please check code in your local area of course too.

Is a single family home with an ADU considered a duplex?
No. There is a difference. I wrote about that here. The struggle is how the lending community and appraisers talk about accessory units vs full-fledged two-unit properties isn’t always the same as the way a city or county thinks about these units. There is also a value aspect to consider. Typically each unit in a traditional two-unit property contributes very significantly to the value whereas as an accessory unit is often “accessory” to the value. In other words, an ADU might not sway value as much for a single family home compared to say taking away one of the units in a traditional duplex.

How do you find comps?
This gets a little tricky because in MLS these units are often called a range of things. Personally I search the property description field and I’ll see what comes up when I type in words like granny flat, accessory unit, ADU, second unit, in-law quarters, etc… Sometimes I even search for two homes on one lot because these units are sometimes listed that way. However, in a map search in MLS you can go to the “other structures” field and then select “guesthouse.” That’s what I did in the image below and look how many properties came up when looking at the past five years of sales. Granted, some of these pins aren’t truly accessory dwellings because they’re a pool house, bonus outbuilding, she-shed, etc.., but this is a great start nonetheless.

What about CC&Rs and rent?
In some areas an accessory unit might not be able to be rented per CC&Rs. If California law has recently superseded this, someone can let me know (people have been emailing me to say California law has, but I haven’t seen anything definitive yet to show these units can be rented (I will update this portion of the post when I hear more)). Otherwise I’ve encountered scenarios where a neighborhood’s CC&Rs will mandate a guesthouse can only be occupied by family members and is not allowed as a rental. I’m not a lawyer, so I cannot speak to any legal issues. I’m just saying before advertising a structure’s rental income in a listing or appraisal, be sure you know the structure can be rented. This might affect value, right?

What do you think about an ADU assessed at the cost of the unit?
I see this happen quite a bit. This isn’t a knock at any Assessor of course. It’s possible that buyers would pay the full cost to build in the resale market, but very often the market doesn’t pay dollar for dollar. In short, if you feel the assessed figure is too high you’re going to need to find out the process to dispute the assessment and show market support for your value opinion. Keep in mind I’m talking about a brand new accessory unit because when it is built you’ll get a supplemental assessment in the mail. As always, if there is nothing to argue, don’t argue. If you do feel value is off though, then be diplomatic and support your opinion with data. Or hire a local appraiser to illuminate market data (the appraiser cannot be an advocate for you though).

I hope this was interesting or helpful. Thanks for being here.

Questions: What else do you wonder about ADUs? Or if you work in real estate, what do you get asked? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

It’s not all about square footage in real estate

By 14 Comments

A bigger house is always worth more, right? It’s really easy to fall into the trap of believing that, but it’s not always true. Let’s talk about it.

Myth: Extra square footage is always worth more.

1) Single story vs two story: Sometimes a large single story will sell for more than a larger two-story. This isn’t always the case, but in some neighborhoods we see this dynamic. So just because a 2-story is larger doesn’t mean it’s more valuable (or a good comp).

2) 55+ Community: In a 55+ community we sometimes see more emphasis on floorplan instead of square footage. Larger models still likely command higher prices, but at the same time the market doesn’t seem as sensitive to square footage differences like we see in other neighborhoods. For example, here are two models in Sun City Lincoln Hills with a 107 sq ft difference. Normally that might not mean much in a typical neighborhood, but it looks like there’s a pretty decent value difference here. On paper it seems like these two models could be perfect comps since they are so close in size, but that might not be the case. 

3) Layout: At times a house with a better layout will sell on par with a larger house with a less desirable layout (even outside a 55+ community). What I mean is buyers might pay the same for a 1,400 sq ft house with an open layout compared to a 1,700 sq ft house with a less open floorplan. This dynamic isn’t always easy to spot in MLS photos, and that’s why it’s so important for agents and appraisers to communicate. I recommend agents to open up conversation with appraisers about the listing (without pressuring to “hit the number”). What feedback did you get from potential buyers? What were buyers attracted to? Is there anything special about the house or neighborhood? When it comes to layout, this is often an “insider detail” that’s frankly easy to miss, so I can’t emphasize how important it is to communicate about this if it’s a relevant factor.

4) Dangerous to always adjust: It’s easy to get trigger-happy about making value adjustments whenever we see a square footage difference. Can you relate? But sometimes a square footage adjustment might not be needed. My advice? Be careful about always giving an adjustment and be cautious to not routinely give the same exact adjustment too. Try to look to the market to see if there should be an adjustment or not, and then proceed.

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

Questions: What point stands out to you the most? Anything else to add? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Why did the appraiser say it was only two bedrooms? It should be three.

By 28 Comments

The real estate agent marketed the property as three bedrooms, Tax Records said it was three, but then the appraiser said it was only two. What the heck? Let me share with you a situation I encountered recently where an appraiser (me) ended up removing one of the “bedrooms” from the room count because of a functional issue. Let’s look more closely below. I’d love to hear your take in the comments.

The layout of the house according to the agent:

2-or-3-bedroom-sacramento-appraisal-blog-part-1

It’s not normal to have a layout like this, right? Imagine getting up to go to the bathroom at night and walking through someone’s room to get there. The middle room really wouldn’t have much privacy either, right? I can also picture a kid in the middle bedroom setting up a taxation system and charging his brother for passage from the rear room.

bedroom access issue - sacramento appraisal blog

The layout of the house according to the appraiser (me):

2 or 3 bedroom - sacramento appraisal blog - part 2

I pulled three-bedroom comps before seeing the property, but I was surprised to discover it wasn’t really a 3-bedroom home because of a functional issue. I know this seems like a subjective call to axe a bedroom, but the functional issue definitely limits the use of the middle room, so it was not considered a bedroom. It’s too bad there was not more foresight when the addition on the rear of the house was done so the floor plan would be more functional. As a side note, I could have labeled the rear room as a den instead of the middle room, but since the rear room was larger in size, I thought it would more likely be used as a bedroom by the market.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Describe correctly: It’s important to describe properties correctly for the sake of clarity and even potential liability. This is true for both agents and appraisers.
  2. A Bedroom with functional obsolescence: I imagine some real estate professionals would call this a 3-bedroom home with functional obsolescence because one has to travel through a “bedroom” to get to a different bedroom. In my mind this was not a functional three-bedroom home, so I chose to describe it as a 2-bedroom home, but I would understand if someone wanted to describe it differently.
  3. The market’s response: The question becomes how to value something like this. Should we compare it to 2-bedroom or 3-bedroom homes? Well, it’s not really a regular 3-bedroom home, but it’s not really a traditional 2-bedroom home either because it has the extra space (den). Ideally, we should find a 2-bedroom property with a separate area like a den, office, or something else that is similar. If we’re lucky we might find a few sales with functional obsolescence (fat chance). Lastly, if the subject property has sold a few times in recent years, we might go back in time and see how the market valued the home. What did it compare to at the time of its previous sales?
  4. Tax Records isn’t the definitive authority: Just because Tax Records says it does not mean it’s accurate. In this case the home was functionally two bedrooms despite Tax Records saying it was three. As much as we want to trust Tax Records, sometimes we have to look at what is actually there and then try to understand why there is a difference between public records and reality. For reference, here are 10 reasons why public records and the appraiser’s square footage are often not the same.

I hope this was helpful. I’d love to hear your take in the comments.

Radio Interview: By the way, I did a radio interview last week on 105.5FM in Sacramento. Realtor Jay Stoops had me on his show. You can listen to our 20-minute conversation below (or here).

Questions: Is this a 2-bedroom home or a 3-bedroom home in your mind? Any other insight or stories to share? Did I miss anything?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

The problem of an addition behind a bedroom

By 21 Comments

Imagine a home owner adds a “Bonus Room” on the rear of a house. It’s nice to have the extra space, right? Well, imagine one of the rear bedrooms now no longer has a direct exit to outside of the home. Is that going to be an issue?

bedroom without egress - by sacramento appraisal blog

The Problem: This home above has an addition of a Bonus Room that essentially removes direct exterior egress from one of the bedrooms. No big deal, right? Well, it actually is a big deal because by definition a bedroom must have two methods of egress. If you didn’t know, according to International Residential Code (R310.1), a bedroom needs to have one doorway that opens to the interior of the house and one doorway or window (of adequate size) that opens directly to the outside of the house (read here for more on what makes a bedroom a bedroom). Thus when an addition of a Bonus Room, Family Room, or Whatever Room blocks the secondary egress in a bedroom….. Houston, we have a problem! All of the sudden a room that was previously considered a bedroom is technically no longer a bedroom. If you’re interested in reading the nitty-gritty of various national codes on the subject, check out this document (pdf).

not a bedroom - sacramento appraisal blog

Impact on Value: Being that I’ve seen this issue twice in the past month, I thought it was worth kicking around some thoughts. Like most things in real estate, we need to look at the problem from a few different angles:

  1. The Lender: Keep in mind a lender might not want to lend on a property when there is a blatant safety issue. Or a lender might ask for the addition to be removed, a secondary egress to be added in the “bedroom” if possible, or for the appraiser to not consider the room as a bedroom any longer. Ultimately the appraiser can ask the lender for some direction or advice, but at the end of the day the appraiser has to communicate very clearly and make decisions that will lead to a credible value.
  2. Not Code Enforcement: Let’s remember it’s not the appraiser’s job to enforce code violations or stop a deal from moving forward if there are code issues. Increasingly lenders want appraisers make comments as if they were home inspectors, engineers, or code enforcement officers, but the appraiser’s job is to come up with a credible value. Bottom line. At the same time, appraisers need to know enough about building code to be able to recognize a blatant egress issue, disclose the issue, and consider if there is any impact on the value (there may or may not be).
  3. Less Bedrooms: Decreasing the bedroom count could impact value since a property is likely less marketable with less bedrooms.
  4. Permits: Let’s realize this addition may not have been done with a permit in the first place, so the appraiser is going to have to figure out what the market is willing to pay for a house that has some non-permitted space. Some appraisers will not assign any value to a non-permitted area, saying “no permit = no value”, while others will try to figure out how much the market is willing to pay for the house in its non-permitted state. Read more on a lack of permits here. Remember that some additions increase the functionality of a floor plan in a positive way, whereas other additions make a floor plan very funky (in a bad way).
  5. The Whole Enchilada: Ultimately, I find myself looking at the “whole enchilada” or entire package of a house when trying to figure out how a layout like this might be seen in the market. For instance, in a recent appraisal consulting assignment, an owner hired me to help him see the market since his house was not selling. On paper it looked like the house should be valued toward the top of the market because of its much larger size, but in actuality the lack of upgrades and funky floor plan (that blocked egress from one bedroom), ended up meaning the house attracted zero offers and was more comparable with the bottom of the market. The way I knew the house was more closely aligned with the bottom of the neighborhood spectrum was finding a few odd floor plan sales (that was lucky), the subject having zero offers at a higher price range, and even a previous sale of the subject property from years ago that showed it sold at the bottom of the market at the time despite its very large size.

I hope that was helpful. By the way, thank you to home inspector Ken Ives for a good conversation on some of the above points as I prepared this post.

Questions: Any thoughts, insight, or stories to share? Did I miss anything? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.