• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

  • About
  • Appraisals
  • Order
  • Ask Ryan
  • Areas
  • Classes
  • Press
  • Trends
  • Share
  • Contact

Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser

The players in the market & normal pendings

February 12, 2019 By Ryan Lundquist 17 Comments

Who are the players in the market? Who is buying and selling? Who is coming? Who is going? These are questions we have to ask to grasp a local market. And for real estate professionals, knowing who the players are helps us serve clients well and sometimes even make future business plans. 

Well, let’s talk about a new player in town called Opendoor. This company is trying to gain a foothold in about 20 markets across the country right now. If you’re not local, are they in your area?

Opendoor posted up in Sacramento last year and they’ve begun to make a splash. They’re not dominating the market by any stretch, but in the region over the past few months they bought over 90 homes. I don’t fully understand the fine print of their business model yet, but in a nutshell they buy from owners privately and then put these homes back on the market to sell to the public. In fact, mostly all of their private purchases are currently re-listed on our local MLS. Opendoor also has an affiliation with Lennar – a local builder.

My real estate antennas: Any time I see a group buying a larger amount of homes, I pay attention. In the past I talked heavily about Blackstone, and in the future I’ll discuss other players whether they’re making a splash or shaping the market (like Blackstone did). Any stories or thoughts?

Now for those interested, let’s talk about the market – especially pendings.

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

—–——– Big local monthly market update (long on purpose) —–——–

The market slumped during the second half of 2018, and now it’s an interesting spot. Let’s talk about it.

THE SHORT VERSION:

  • Pendings were normal for January
  • Sales volume has slumped for 8 months in a row
  • Prices are barely up from last year
  • Most metrics softened as expected for January
  • The market is starting to wake up for the spring
  • This post is long on purpose. Skim or pour a cup of coffee.

DOWNLOAD 70+ graphs: Please download all graphs here as a zip file. See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

THE LONGER VERSION:

Here’s some of the bigger topics to consider right now.

We need time: We don’t have a totally clear picture for where the market is going yet in 2019. We still need more time. Here is what I am specifically looking for in the stats over these next few months.

Normal pendings: It’s big news that pending sales were normal this past month compared to last January. We’ve had a slump in sales volume for eight months, so what does this mean? Well, it could be the market trying to find some normalcy after two quarters of sluggishness. Though the real cause very likely stems from mortgage rates recently declining. It’s amazing how that can affect buyers and even sales volume. Remember, pendings in January will likely close in February and especially March. So if we start to see a normal level of pendings in January and February, we may see sales volume show normalcy for the time being.

Yeah, most metrics softened: We saw the typical signs we’d expect to see at this time of year with most metrics. It look longer to sell last month, prices dipped, inventory increased, and sales volume sloughed. Though overall the softening in most metrics felt way more pronounced.

Low rates are steroids: Mortgage rates declined and that’s seeming to draw some buyers back into the market. Low rates are like steroids for demand – at least temporarily.

More listings this year: There’s more listings this year compared to last year at the same time. In fact, it’s been about five years since we’ve started the year with this much housing supply.

Waking up: I’m hearing from many agents about more buyer attention on their listings lately. More traffic at open houses. More offers. It’s still to be determined what this spring market will look like exactly, but for now the spring season is starting to move.

Not seeing aggressive price gains: The rate of price change has slowed. What I mean is in years past we’d see 7-10% price increases when running stats, but now we’re seeing modest 2-3% year-over-year price gains. 

In case you need slumping trivia to impress friends: Last month we saw the worst sales volume in 11 years for a January. We’ve had eight months in a row of year-over-year sales volume declines. That’s a dismal stat and there’s no sugar-coating it. If this trend doesn’t change we’re going to have a much different market. Yet this is why seeing normal pendings for January is a big deal because today’s level of pendings could presumably show a normal number of sales in a couple of months when these properties close.

The Tallest Graph in Sacramento: Here’s a look at over 60,000 single family detached sales in Sacramento County. This graph is inspired by Jonathan Miller.

Less offers: Here’s an interesting way to see the market has slowed. Multiple offers are down about 11% this year.

More concessions in new construction: Lots of builders are offering credits and concessions to help get their deals done lately. This is a symptom of a slower market. It seems more sellers are also offering concessions and credits too. Buyers, don’t be afraid to negotiate with sellers since the market has slowed, but at the same time don’t think you are driving the market either. Keep your perception of power in check. And sellers, talk with your agent about whether credits or concessions might need to be an option on the table.

Final thought before the graphs: In closing, the market is in an interesting spot. It feels like it’s juggling uncertainty from last year with a striving for normalcy today. We only have one month of data and we need to keep watching to see how this market is going to emerge.

I could write more, but let’s get visual instead.

BIG ISSUES TO WATCH:

1) SLOWING MOMENTUM: The stats show the market is slowing down when we look at the rate of change by year. Looking at monthly, quarterly, and annual numbers helps give a balanced view of things.

2) SALES VOLUME SLUMP: It’s important to look at sales volume in a few ways to get the bigger picture. Here it is by month and year.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY:

Key Stats:

  • January volume down 21.5%
  • Volume is down 4.7% over the past 12 months

SACRAMENTO REGION:

Key Stats:

  • January volume down 17.7%
  • Volume is down 5.8% over the past 12 months

PLACER COUNTY:

Key Stats:

  • January volume down 10.9%
  • Volume is down 7.7% over the past 12 months

3) LAST YEAR VS THIS YEAR: Here’s a comparison of last year compared to the same time this year. What do you see?

NOTE: Placer County had very few sales this January, so I wouldn’t put much weight on the price figures for this month.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY (more graphs here):

 

SACRAMENTO REGION (more graphs here):

PLACER COUNTY (more graphs here):

I hope that was helpful.

DOWNLOAD 70+ graphs: Please download all graphs here as a zip file. See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

BLOG BASH: Just a reminder I’m hosting a blog party on March 2nd from 3-7pm. You’re invited to celebrate my blog’s 10th birthday. I know, that sounds a little cheesy. But I’ll be buying the first 100 beers… Details here.

Questions: Any stories to share about who is playing the market right now? What are you experiencing right now in the trenches with buyers and sellers?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Market Trends Tagged With: Appraisal, Appraiser, buyers and sellers, buying and selling, Home Appraiser, House Appraiser, increasing inventory, inventory, investors, million dollar sales, multilpe offers, new construction, Opendoor, Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser, sacramento regional real estate blog, sales volume slump, trend graphs

Seeing the market while driving, crunching numbers, & eating tacos

April 13, 2018 By Ryan Lundquist 13 Comments

It’s not just about numbers. Look, I geek out over stats, but sometimes all we need to do is drive around town or have a few conversations to see the market. Today I wanted to share some trends I’m seeing by sharing photos I’ve taken recently. Then for those interested we’ll get into the numbers in my big monthly market update below. Anyway, let’s take a drive.

The rage of modern homes: Modern units like this are popping up in Sacramento in places that are typically close to Downtown. This small development is located in Midtown.

Flipping seminars: I’ve seen this guy on late-night TV promising to teach people how to flip homes. The problem? The market isn’t actually that great for flipping in Sacramento right now. Read about celebrity flipping seminars here.

The Prince tree: A local artist in Citrus Heights paid tribute to Prince in her front yard. I know something like this would not fly in an HOA community, but it reminds us there is maybe some room for creative expression in real estate.

Marijuana homes getting busted: There was a big raid last week where federal agents targeted 75 homes in the Sacramento region that were suspected to be “grow houses”. Remember, recreational cannabis is legal in California, but it’s never legal to have a commercial grow operation in a residential property. Anyway, I came across a different article in the SacBee that listed nine addresses of previous grow houses (golden data for appraisers).

Tearing down the neighborhood: A ranch house in Arden Park was purchased for $462,000 and torn down to build a custom home (currently pending close to $1.3M). This doesn’t happen in every neighborhood, so I’m always asking questions: What is being built? Who is buying? What is being flipped? Where is the bottom of the price market? Where is the top?

Neighborhoods that are changing: This is a colorful six-unit modern project in Oak Park off 2nd Avenue. Modern units like this are starting to pop up – especially around The Broadway Triangle.  

Here’s a modern project under construction on 1st Avenue in Oak Park.

The word on the street (while eating tacos): Every few months or so I get together with a group of real estate friends to eat at Chandos (my fav taco joint). It’s not like we gather to have exclusive rigid market talk, but I always leave with some insight because our taco club has investors, a loan officer, and a Realtor / flipper. I find understanding a market is about crunching numbers, but it’s also about the word on the street. This is why I regularly ask people, “What are you seeing out there?”

I hope that was interesting or helpful. Anything to add?

And now for anyone interested in the numbers….

–——-——- Big monthly market update (it’s long on purpose) ———–——-

Spring is definitely here. Well, the market has been alive for a couple of months, but we’re now really starting to see it in the stats. The median price rose about 4% in the region last month and it’s up 9% from last year. Overall we’re seeing all the normal signs of a spring market in that it took 7 less days to sell last month, more listings are hitting the market, and sales volume is increasing for the season. Housing inventory is up slightly in the region from where it was last year and so is sales volume (though volume is down 1.5% in Sacramento County).

New recap images: I spend so much time putting together graphs, but I’ve struggled to figure out a way to quickly sum things up. Anyway, here’s a stab at a summary. Do you like these? Anything you’d change? Feedback is welcome.

A few quick things:

Not much cash actually: It’s easy to believe cash is dominating – especially from the Bay Area, but it’s really not (did you hear that sellers?). Cash sales were 15% of all sales last month in the region and in Sacramento County we actually have about 3% less cash this year so far.

Oh dang… the median price: If you didn’t know, the median price is now 6.9% lower than when the “bubble” burst in Sacramento County in 2005. I tend to see jaws drop when sharing this stat, but here are some things to keep in mind about bubble conversations. Remember, there is no formula that says our market will “pop” if we go 6.9% higher, so it’s important to not get too stuck on the previous peak. Today’s market certainly has an inflated feel, but it’s also being driven by different factors than 2005 too, so it’s not a perfect comparison to always look back to 2005. Anyway, let’s not get too side tracked, but navigating this conversation will be key in coming time for real estate professionals, and I’ve heard some sellers wanting to list too in light of how high prices are. 

Zillow is going to sell homes: Yesterday HousingWire reported Zillow is going to be selling homes. There was suspicion this would happen, but The Big Z always denied it. Well, the cat’s out of the bag and I’m wondering how this will unfold. I’m also wondering if they’re going to try to chop agent fees. Let’s talk about this more as things develop. On a side note, will we have to watch listings and sales on Zillow in addition to MLS?

I could write more, but let’s get visual instead.

DOWNLOAD 61 graphs HERE: Please download all graphs here as a zip file. See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

SACRAMENTO COUNTY (more graphs here):

SACRAMENTO REGION (more graphs here):

PLACER COUNTY (more graphs here):

DOWNLOAD 61 graphs HERE: Please download all graphs here as a zip file. See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

Questions: What images around town remind you of what the market is doing? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Market Trends Tagged With: Home Appraiser, House Appraiser, housing shortage, low inventory, Placer County, regional real estate trends, rising prices, Sacramento County, Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser, Sacramento real estate market update, Yolo County

Does it help appraisers when agents increase the pending price in MLS?

September 20, 2017 By Ryan Lundquist 7 Comments

Does it help appraisers when agents increase the pending price in MLS for the subject property? In other words, if a house was listed at $400,000, but gets into contract at $415,000, does it help if the pending price is changed to $415,000 in MLS? This might seem like a silly topic, but I get asked this question all the time, and it seems like many believe this makes a difference for value. Here’s my opinion, and I welcome your two cents also.

Quick Answer: First off, sometimes agents think appraisers only look at the pending price, but appraisers make it a point to view the entire listing history. If you didn’t know, the Fannie Mae appraisal form actually asks appraisers to input the complete pricing history of the subject property into the appraisal. The appraisal report therefore records the original list price, any price changes, and the pending price. So it’s not like the appraiser or lender is blind to the fact the subject property was originally listed for less and is now in contract for more. In short, upping the list price for the subject property doesn’t help the appraisal come in higher or do anything for value. We have to remember the proof of value is found in the comps instead of whether the list price in MLS was increased or not for the subject property. However, on a different but related note it can be useful when appraisers are choosing comps and they see other pendings in the neighborhood getting into contract at higher levels. After all, pending sales showing higher prices might help us see the market is increasing or even help us make upward time adjustments. So while this practice of changing the list price in MLS for the subject property doesn’t do anything for value, in my mind it can be useful when looking at other pending sales in the neighborhood to see if everything is getting bid up or in contract at higher levels.

Three questions:

  1. What is the goal of this practice?
  2. If this practice is not done when the property is in contract for less, why should it be done when the property is in contract for more?
  3. If this happens in mass could it screw up data in any way?

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

Questions: What is your opinion on this practice? Is it a good idea or not? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Random Stuff Tagged With: appraisers looking at listing history, choosing comps, comp selection, data in MLS, Fannie Mae appraisal form, fooling the appraiser, listing data, Market Value, MLS, Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser, talking to appraisers

When using older sales is the best option

July 20, 2017 By Ryan Lundquist 15 Comments

Let’s talk about choosing comps. I want to share an example of what I did not long ago when there were no recent sales for a unique model in a tract subdivision. Anything to add? I’d love to hear your take.

The situation: The subject property is a larger single story home with a casita. In this case the builder built only a handful of homes with a casita, so comps would be limited. If you aren’t familiar with a casita, it’s a term used to refer to an extra housing unit or detached area. I find it’s often interchanged with “in-law unit” or “accessory dwelling”, but we have to remember an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) actually needs a sleeping area, bathroom, and kitchen to be an ADU. In this case the “casita” only has a bedroom and bathroom, so while it’s tempting to call it an accessory dwelling, it’s really not because there isn’t a kitchen.

The problem: There are zero recent casita sales, so it’s not easy to readily understand what the market is willing to pay for one of these units. What do we compare the casita unit with in today’s market? How do we adjust for it?

What I did: In an ideal world I would’ve had a nearby neighborhood with casita sales, but I didn’t find anything, so I chose to study the neighborhood market by researching three casita sales in the neighborhood over the past ten years. As long as the data was good, I would use research from sales in the past to help me value a property today.

Immediately I noticed the casita sales were clearly commanding a price premium. I thought that this might be the case, but it was still good to confirm instead of assume. Keep in mind if you don’t know how to graph, that’s okay. You can see the same thing when pulling a CMA or printing out sales. Here is a tutorial though in case you want to learn to make a graph like this.

The next thing I did was to research how the casita units compared with other specific models at the time of their sale. Being that most casita homes were somewhere around 2500 sq ft (without the casita), I wanted to see how these units competed with other homes that were around that size. The beauty of having three older sales was I could find what the price adjustment was in each of those situations compared to other specific models. This would prove valuable since I had three recent 2500 sq ft sales without a casita, and I would need to make a value adjustment for the casita in today’s market.

I won’t say exactly what my adjustment was, though maybe I will in the comments.

The big point: Sometimes we have to look back in time to understand how value works. Don’t be afraid to pour through many years of sales to help establish context. Spend time answering the question, “How does a property like this fit into the market?” We can do this by scouring years of sales in the immediate neighborhood, but we might also look to the surrounding market too for competitive locations. Of course just because we research sales that are many years old does not mean we will use them in a current valuation (or a listing presentation for agents). I really don’t have a problem with using older sales when appropriate because we can always make an adjustment depending on how the market has changed over time. But let’s remember FHA wants appraisers to use comps within 12 months, so I probably couldn’t get away with using a sale from three years ago in a lender appraisal. However, I could pull in research from the past to help support the value for what the casita is worth.

I hope this was helpful or interesting.

Questions: Anything else to add? Did I miss something? When have you used older sales to help see the context of value? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Appraisal Stuff Tagged With: accessory dwelling unit, ADU, casita, home appraisals, House Appraisal, in-law quarters, Natomas Neighborhood, Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser, tips for valuing a home with a casita, tract builder, trend graphs

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 39
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Ryan

 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Instagram

Subscribe to Weekly Post

* indicates required

Search this site

Blog Categories

  • Appraisal Stuff (407)
  • Bankruptcy (3)
  • Divorce (4)
  • Estate Settlement (6)
  • FHA Appraisal Articles (56)
  • Internet (53)
  • Market Trends (476)
  • Photos from the Field (126)
  • Property Taxes (70)
  • Random Stuff (231)
  • Resources (566)
  • Videos (161)

Blog Archives: 2009 – 2021

Lundquist Appraisal Links

  • Appraisal Order Form
  • Appraisal Website
  • Rancho Cordova Appraiser Website
  • Sacramento Appraisal Blog Sitemap
  • Sacramento Real Estate Appraiser Facebook Page
  • Twitter: Sacramento Appraiser (@SacAppraiser)
  • YouTube: Sacramento Appraiser Channel

Most Recent Posts

  • My new sewer line adds huge value, right?
  • The housing market nobody predicted
  • Real estate trends to watch in 2021
  • You carried me & a spreadsheet for Christmas
  • Real estate drama (and a market update)
  • Goodbye California. Is everyone leaving?
  • How much are buyers paying above the list price?
  • What would happen to the housing market if we went on lockdown again?
  • Overpricing, multiple offers, & hot ranges
  • Why your home isn’t worth 16% more today

Disclaimer

First off, thank you for being here. Now let's get into the fine print. The material and information contained on this website is the copyrighted property of Ryan Lundquist and Lundquist Appraisal Company. Content on this website may not be reproduced or republished without prior written permission from Ryan Lundquist.

Please see my Sharing Policy on the navigation bar if you are interested in sharing portions of any content on this blog.

The information on this website is meant entirely for educational purposes and is not intended in any way to support an opinion of value for your appraisal needs or any sort of value conclusion for a loan, litigation, tax appeal or any other potential real estate or non-real estate purpose. The material found on this website is meant for casual reading only and is not intended for use in a court of law or any other legal use. Ryan will not appear in court in any capacity based on any information posted here. For more detailed market analysis to be used for an appraisal report or any appraisal-related purpose or valuation consulting, please contact Ryan at 916-595-3735 for more information.

There are no affiliate links on this blog, but there are three advertisements. Please do your homework before doing business with any advertisers as advertisements are not affiliated with this blog in any way. Two ads are located on the sidebar and one is at the bottom of each post. The ads earn a minor amount of revenue and are a simple reward for providing consistent original content to readers. If you think the ads interfere with your blog experience or the integrity of the blog somehow, let me know. I'm always open to feedback. Thank you again for being here.

Copyright © 2021 Sacramento Appraisal Blog