Sacramento Appraisal Blog | Real Estate Appraiser

Real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

appraisals in Sacramento

My last blog post in 2017, Bitcoin, & a big market update

By 10 Comments

I started this blog almost nine years ago, and this is my last post for the year. After next week I’ll be lying low, enjoying family, doing some woodworking, staying on my diet (I’m down 30 pounds), and taking some time to get recharged. But first I have two things on my mind. 

Thank you: Thank you so much for hanging with me for another year. I cannot tell you how much I appreciate your support, friendship, comments, emails, insight, and the business you send my way. It might sound cheesy, but I get so much joy out of writing once a week and I’m grateful for you. It’s been a dynamic year for business too, and I honestly could not be doing this without your support. Here’s to continuing to grow together. Please don’t stop asking questions, pitching in thoughts, and challenging my thinking.

Big market stats: Secondly, if you’re looking for the latest market trends for Sacramento, you’ve come to the right place. Check it out below. 

From my family to yours, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays.

–——-——- Big monthly market update (it’s long on purpose) ———–——-

The market is often dull during the fall, but that’s not the case this year. I mean, we’re definitely seeing slightly lower prices, it’s taking longer to sell, and sales volume is sloughing, so clearly the signs of a slower market are here. Yet this fall season isn’t really incredibly slow or painfully dull either.  

Sideways: Price metrics were more or less sideways last month, though some metrics either showed a slight uptick or a slight decline. Overall there wasn’t much change from the month before in terms of price, but it took an average of three days longer to sell. This November saw almost the same amount of sales as last November for the region. Housing inventory is slightly higher than the same time last year, but it’s still hovering at 1.60 months for the region – which is still low. In other words, the housing shortage didn’t go anywhere.

Bitcoin & Modest Appreciation: The rapid increase of Bitcoin has been the talk of town lately, and it’s also seemed to fuel some conversations about quickly rising values in real estate. I get the comparison, but we’re really not seeing Bitcoin type huge increases in real estate. In fact, this year in Sacramento values have seemed more modest in many price ranges, which means somewhere around 5-7% upticks. I realize “modest” in California would be huge in other areas of the country, but that’s not really the case on the west coast. Yet the bottom of the price market easily saw 10-15% increases in many areas of Sacramento. That’s not so modest.

Our “Bitcoin” real estate market in 2012 & 2013: The closest to rapid appreciation we’ve seen in Sacramento in recent years took place between 2012 and 2013 in which we saw price metrics change by 35-40% over the course of one year. During that time both real estate agents and appraisers said it wasn’t easy to keep up with how quickly prices were changing.

$7M Sale: Did you see the sale in Granite Bay that closed two days ago at $6.95M? What the? This is one of the highest residential sales ever in the Sacramento area. You can watch a video tour of it here. Also, that $4.1M condo listing Downtown has been pending since November. I don’t know what it’s in contract for yet, but let’s talk about it when it closes.

Rents: Sacramento made a list again on the fastest growing rents. Yardi Matrix reports a 9.1% uptick in rent year over year in November. Now if we can only get wages to grow by 9.1% too.

Price Sensitive: Lastly, the market may not be incredibly dull like it is during some fall seasons, but it’s still price sensitive. This means buyers are tending to be logical, well-informed, and often not so desperate as to offer any amount. My advice? Don’t just look to the high sales from the spring and summer. What is getting into contract right now? That will give you a good picture of the current market and a hint for how to price too (possibly lower than the height of spring / summer).

I could go on, but let’s get visual.

DOWNLOAD 69 graphs HERE: Please download all graphs in this post and more here as a zip file (includes a stat sheet too). See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

SACRAMENTO COUNTY (more graphs & stats here):

SACRAMENTO COUNTY:

  1. The median price is currently $349,450. It’s the same as last month but down 1% from summer.
  2. The median price is 7.5% higher than the same time last year.
  3. Sales volume in November was 4.5% lower this year than 2016. There were 1354 single family detached sales last month.
  4. It took an average of 32 days to sell a home last month (one year ago it was taking 4 days longer).
  5. The median days on market last month was 18 days.
  6. It took 3 more days to sell in Nov. compared to October (median days).
  7. FHA sales were 20% of all sales last month in the county.
  8. Only 1.4% of sales last month were bank-owned & 0.9% were short sales.
  9. The avg price per sq ft was about $224, which increased last month (11% higher than last year).
  10. The avg sales price softened slightly last month and is currently $385,778. This is 10% higher than last year.
  11. Cash sales were 13% of all sales last month.

SACRAMENTO REGION (more graphs & stats here):

SACRAMENTO REGION:

  1. The median price is $389,000. It softened nearly 1% last month.  
  2. The median price is 9.5% higher than the same time last year.
  3. Sales volume in November was nearly the same as Nov 2016. There were 2220 single family detached sales last month.
  4. It took an average of 36 days to sell a home last month (one year ago it was taking 5 days longer).
  5. The median days on market last month was 19 days, which means properties are selling really quickly.
  6. The median days on market increased by 1 day last month, which shows a slowing in the market.  
  7. FHA sales were 17.2% of all sales last month.
  8. Only 1.5% of sales last month were bank-owned & 0.8% were short sales.
  9. The avg price per sq ft was about $230, which increased last month (10% higher than last year).
  10. The avg sales price increased less than 1% last month and is up 10% higher than last year.
  11. Cash sales were 14% of all sales last month.

PLACER COUNTY (more graphs & stats here):

PLACER COUNTY:

  1. The median price is currently $451,000 and decreased about 1% last month.
  2. The median price is 5.6% higher than the same time last year.
  3. Sales volume in November was 3.6% lower than 2016. There were 473 single family detached sales.
  4. It took an average of 40 days to sell a home last month (one year ago it was taking 9 days longer).
  5. The median days on market last month was 19 days, which means properties are selling really quickly.
  6. The median days on market deceased by 3 days last month (don’t read too much into that). 
  7. FHA sales were 12.6% of all sales.
  8. There were only 9 bank-owned sales last month and only 2 short sales.
  9. The avg price per sq ft was $236, which is slightly higher than last month (9% higher than last year).
  10. The avg sales price is currently $513,280. This is 6.8% higher than last year.
  11. Cash sales were 17% of all sales last month.

DOWNLOAD 69 graphs HERE: Please download all graphs in this post and more here as a zip file (includes a stat sheet too). See my sharing policy for 5 ways to share (please don’t copy verbatim).

Questions: What are you seeing out there in the market? Anything I missed? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

That place where fame & real estate meet

By 12 Comments

How does fame impact a home? Does it matter for value if a famous person lived there? What if something notorious happened at the property? Let’s talk about this and consider a few examples. Please note there are entire books written on this subject, so don’t expect an exhaustive dissertation here. Any thoughts? I’d love to hear your take in the comments.

Here are a few examples:

Breaking Bad: The house where the TV series Breaking Bad was filmed was all over the news last month because the owner is building a 6′ front yard fence to keep people out of her yard. According to Albuquerque KOB4 there is a constant stream of visitors and fans have even thrown pizzas on the roof to reenact the main character Walter White doing so in an episode. The owner is clearly not thrilled, and I can’t imagine neighbors are either unless they can somehow monetize the situation.

Kurt Cobain’s Baby House: Brandon Turner at Bigger Pockets is an investor and he accidentally bought a home where Kurt Cobain lived as a baby. The duplex was purchased as an investment without any knowledge of the lead singer of Nirvana’s connection to the property. But tenants began complaining about photos being taken of the front of the house, and that’s how the connection was discovered.

The Almost Governor’s Mansion in California: The State of California built a Governor’s mansion in the 1970s in Carmichael, which is about 10 miles from Downtown Sacramento. This mansion began construction under Governor Ronald Reagan’s leadership, but it was not completed until Jerry Brown took office. Brown actually refused to live in this house, which he dubbed “The Taj Mahal”. This home sold for 4.1M in 2004 and has 8 bedrooms, 8 bathrooms and is 11,984 sq ft. The mansion is still there today, but some of the site has been subdivided for a few custom homes. This is literally one of a few residential homes EVER in Sacramento County that sold above $4M.

Reagan House in the Fab 40s Neighborhood: Governor Ronald Reagan and his family chose not to live in the old Governor’s mansion in Downtown Sacramento back in the 70s, so they moved to East Sacramento on 45th Street to lease a home in the “Fabulous 40s” neighborhood. The home boasted over 6,000 square feet with six bedrooms and four bathrooms (according to Tax Records). The home last recorded for $1,765,000 in May 2000. Not everyone can say, “The future President used to live here when he was Governor”. Do you think that matters for value?

Here’s a look at the price point of the Reagan house. What do you see?

Homicidal Handyman House: There is a property in Oak Park where a serial killer dubbed “The Homicidal Handyman” murdered someone in the later 80s. This property was purchased last year by an investor and I’m waiting to see if it comes on the market (it has a choice location). This murder occurred about 30 years ago though, and the reality is that stigma associated with gruesome crimes fades over time. In other words, it might be a big deal for value to buy a property right after a murder, but much less of an issue if the crime occurred 30 years ago. I observed a recent murder property in the Sacramento market and in this case there was a 5-10% hit on value, though it might not have been an issue at all had the murder taken place 30 years ago instead of recently. Architectural Digest actually did a great piece on stigma recently and I was pleased to see they interviewed Jonathan Miller.

Dorothea Puente Murder House: Seven bodies were discovered at a duplex on F St in Sacramento in the late 80s compliments of Dorothea Puente. She lured victims to her “boarding” home, drugged and buried them, and then cashed their social security checks. This Victorian duplex has some charm as you can see, but it definitely has a dark history too. There was a documentary made about this house in 2015 and the owner has even given tours through the years too. This just goes to show it may be possible to monetize a famous house. Though in this case the owner has donated tour proceeds toward organizations working to alleviate homelessness (way to go).

Here’s a sales history of the Puente duplex. What do you see?

Lady Bird House: A recent movie called Lady Bird is set in Sacramento and had some filming done in the city too. Here is the front of one of the home’s shown in the movie (located in Fab 40s). This was not the main character’s dwelling, so it may not attract much of a following, though it’ll be interesting to see if people snap selfies here. For reference, the San Francisco Chronicle shared Lady Bird filming locations so fans can visit. In this case the owner probably has some bragging rights to say, “My home was in Lady Bird”, and I’d imagine any future listing would mention this fact. But will the market as a whole pay more for a house like this because it had a minor role in a movie? I’ll give you my opinion in the comments if you give me yours.
 
And here’s my Lady Bird selfie.  🙂
 
Closing thoughts: It seems like fame can either be good or bad when it comes to real estate values. If a house is famous for something gruesome, it could easily harm value (duh). But part of it depends on how long ago a crime occurred. On the other hand if a home is historically important, it could be a huge bonus for value (duh again). Yet fame can come at a cost too by increasing foot traffic and looky-loos. Would an owner have to disclose the stream of unwanted visitors to potential buyers? Could this potentially limit marketability? Could it impact rental value if there were camera flashes happening at night? Would tenants get fed up over time? These are important questions to ask. Lastly, we would be wise to not overthink a property’s value that had “15 minutes of fame” so to speak. Thus just because a home had a cameo in a movie or was previously owned by someone famous does not mean at the end of the day the market is going to pay anything more for the property. It’s true certain fans might offer more for a particular home owned by a celebrity or athlete, but what would the market as a whole pay? That’s always the bigger question. 
 

Think Like an Appraiser Class (I’m teaching): By the way, I’m doing my favorite class on Dec 7 from 9am-12pm called How to Think Like an Appraiser. We’ll talk through comp selection, making adjustments, tips for talking about value, and what to do in various scenarios. Details here.

Questions: Would you buy a house that was famous in a movie or owned by someone famous? Why or why not? Have you seen any measurable impact to value for a celebrity property? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Bad real estate advice & blue bathrooms

By 11 Comments

There’s no shortage of bad real estate advice out there. Today let’s look at a few common examples and talk through Zillow’s recent claim that blue bathrooms add $5,400 in value. Any thoughts? I’d love to hear your take.

Common bad real estate value advice:

1) Solar Salesman: “You will get $20,000 in value if you buy this $20,000 solar system. Buyers always pay for the full cost of the system in the resale market”

2) Enclosed Patio Contractor: “This 400 sq ft enclosed patio will definitely add 400 extra sq ft of living area to your home when you sell it.” 

3) Energy Salesman: “If you do these energy upgrades for $28,000, you’ll get $28,000 back in value. There won’t be any trouble selling your home after going through the PACE program either.” 

4) Landscaper: “Studies show doing $2,000 of landscaping will yield about $10,000 in value.”

5) Zillow’s Blue Bathroom: “Homes with blue bathrooms sell for $5,400 more than expected.”

What other examples can you think of?

Thoughts on Zillow’s blue bathroom:

Zillow put out a press release last week stating, “Homes with blue bathrooms, often found in hues of powder blue or light periwinkle, sold for $5,400 more than expected.” Thanks Jonathan Miller for writing about this. A few thoughts:

a) False hope: Consumers hear they can increase their value by $5,400, so they think they can just buy a gallon of paint for $30 and make some huge profit. As Jonathan Miller said, “The consumer absorbs the results as gospel without challenge.”

b) Location: Which market would this idea of blue paint apply? Is it true in Portland, Sacramento, Birmingham, and Baton Rouge? Is it equally true at $200,000 as well as $900,000? Was it true when the market was collapsing in 2007 or is it only true right now? How long will it continue to be true? 

c) Buyer Behavior: When we hear such precise value claims, let’s take a step back and ask if buyers actually behave that way. Have you ever met a buyer who said, “Oh snap, that blue is on point. I’m gonna pay $5,400 more for this house now”? Probably not. To be fair we all know color does make a difference for value. Yet making such a precise value claim at $5,400 ironically doesn’t line up with how buyers tend to behave in real life.

d) Multiple factors: There are so many factors when it comes to a house selling at a certain price. Maybe the blue paint is part of the package, but what if it’s also the condition, remodeled kitchen, refinished wood floors, landscaping, updated bathrooms, location, garage size, multiple fireplaces, school district, built-in pool, etc… Maybe it’s just me, but isolating only one inexpensive factor and attributing a large value boost seems like a stretch.

My advice? Be careful when individuals without local real estate expertise start giving you specific value advice. Of course their advice might be spot on, but sometimes people say things in order to get a contract signed. Also, be wary of general stats because they might not make any sense for the local real estate market or for every property type (or market). Lastly, before doing something significant to your home, you might consider finding trustworthy real estate professionals in your local market who can help give advice or steer you in the right direction.

I hope this was interesting or helpful.

Questions: What other examples of bad real estate advice can you think of? What do you think of studies that make specific value claims? Anything else to add? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

How does a reduced agent commission impact the appraisal?

By 27 Comments

How does a reduced commission from a real estate agent end up impacting the appraised value? Does it matter? Let’s talk about that.

1) Comps vs contract: We have to remember value is found in the comps rather than the contract price. Thus imagine if both agents gave up their commission because they were feeling generous (and wanted to work for free). Does this mean the subject is now worth 6% less? Not at all because we find value from the comps rather than what the subject property is in contract for.

2) Add back in the reduction: When choosing comps and I read in MLS, “Buyer’s agent reduced commission”, it’s a tell I need to call for more information and find out what went on. In the case to the right the buyer’s agent was the buyer and waived the commission. Being that this $850,000 home sold about 3% lower than other sales, it was prudent for me to give an upward 3% adjustment to account for the commission that normally would’ve been padded into the contract price. Otherwise if I blindly used this comp without accounting for the reality that it closed lower for a reason, I could have undervalued the subject property.

UPDATE: I’ve received some grief from a few appraisers over point #2. Fannie Mae does not allow positive adjustments for concessions (though are my examples financing or sales concessions since the seller really didn’t give anything to the buyer?). Here’s the thing. If a sale legitimately sold too low because the agent waived a commission, appraisers have to consider if there was any impact to the price. Bottom line. I find many agents waive their commissions when they are buyers, so these “comps” may need to be given less weight in the overall value (or maybe adjusted up somehow). Ultimately we have to know the story of the comps so we can tell the story of value for the subject property. Don’t lose sight of that in the midst of my example – even if you disagree with the methodology.

3) No impact: There are times when I read in MLS that one of the agents waived or reduced a commission, but the property really closed right where it should have. In a case like this it can be frustrating that an appraiser doesn’t give an upward adjustment, but there’s not really one to give if the property sold on par with everything else. The truth is some agents who are buyers waive a commission without really getting a price discount. It happens.

4) Rubber stamping: Appraisers have to be cautious to not “rubber stamp” a lower contract price when there is a waived commission on the subject property. For instance, a property was listed around $950,000 and had multiple offers at that level. A cash buyer ended up getting into contract at $900,000. However, the real price would have been $960,000, but the buyer paid $60,000 of commissions and fees outside of escrow so the sales price would be lower (smart move to get a lower tax base). Anyway, as an appraiser I have to be careful to be objective and weigh the market in the comps rather than “rubber stamp” a property like this at the contract price at $900,000.

Advice to real estate agents:

1) Make it clear in MLS: Be clear in MLS when a commission has been waived or reduced. This helps appraisers when they are choosing comps.

2) Tell the story: When you’re talking with appraisers about critical neighborhood sales during a listing, I would definitely recommend pointing out any commission reductions in important comps because at times it’s easy to miss the fine print in MLS about waived commissions. In point #2 above I was appraising something for a cash buyer and I was told, “The buyer’s agent was actually the buyer on the house a few doors down and she waived the commission. You can definitely call to verify.” I appreciated the heads-up – especially since this detail was not in MLS.

I hope that was helpful.

How to Think Like an Appraiser: I’m teaching a class at SAR on May 18th from 9-12pm called How to Think Like an Appraiser. Click here for details.

Questions: What point above stands out to you most? Anything else to add? I’d love to hear your take.

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.