Who is selling right now? Some say it’s mostly people who bought over the past few years. Others say it’s just Boomers with dated homes. Well, what do the stats show? Let’s take a look at the numbers. I’m focusing on my local market, but I hope you find this interesting no matter where you are.

UPCOMING SPEAKING GIGS:
9/10/25 Windermere Sacramento
9/16/25 Culbertson & Gray (private)
9/18/25 Realty One Group (ROG Talks) register here
9/24/25 Keller Williams Roseville
9/25/25 Further Together (register here)
9/26/25 PCAR
9/30/25 Elk Grove Regional MLS Meeting
10/15/25 EDH Coldwell Banker (private)
10/21/25 Orangevale MLS Meeting
10/23/25 CREB Meeting (TBA)
10/24/25 Fusion Rally in Denver, CO
11/4/25 SAR Main Meeting
11/5/25 KW Elk Grove
12/9/25 Downtown Regional MLS Meeting
12/10/25 SAFE Credit Union (TBA)
1/14/26 Windermere EDH / Placerville
2/11/26 San Joaquin County presentation (TBA)

DIGGING DEEPER INTO SELLERS
I hope today’s research provides some clues into who is selling. When looking at current listings, how long ago did sellers buy? For instance, 5.0% of current listings previously sold in 2021 on MLS.

Are current listings mostly from people who bought over the past few years?
No, but this is a solid chunk of the market. 18.4% of listings (this also includes pendings) represent homes that were previously purchased between 2020 and 2024 in the region. Don’t get me wrong. This is a very decent portion, but it’s not the majority as some suggest when saying, “Bro, all the sellers today bought when rates were low, and now they need to unload.”
Are owners with low rates holding on to their homes?
Yes. We’re not seeing a flood of these owners, but this portion is definitely growing. Today, there are conservatively somewhere around five hundred listings with a low rate (assuming those who purchased in portions of 2020 and 2021 have a rate around 3%). My sense is people are going to do all they can to hang on to their lower monthly payment, but as time goes on, we should see more owners sell simply because lifestyle and finances will mandate change. Case-in-point. I have a friend who moved to Placer County a few years ago, but now the plan is to move back to Sacramento despite having a sub-3% rate. In other words, it’s not always about the numbers and math. Sometimes lifestyle changes happen, and that’s the trump card. By the way, as these homes come to the market more, we’ll have more conversation about assumable mortgages (only FHA and VA are assumable).

Do sellers have massive equity?
Yes. The vast bulk of listings have ample equity, especially since over half of homes haven’t sold on MLS since 2012. But there are some short sales listings, and these properties represent 0.8% of the market. This is a tiny portion, but if prices persist to decline, we should expect to see this number rise.
Are current listings mostly properties purchased long ago?
Yes, it looks that way. 54.2% of current listings have not sold on MLS since 2012, so the majority of these homes haven’t seen a for sale sign in the yard in quite some time. This lines up with something I’ve been noticing in recent years where many homes are dated and often the byproduct of heirs putting an inherited home on the market instead of keeping it. These homes were often previously owned by the Silent Generation and Boomers. I’m not saying the bulk of listings fall into this category, but there does seem to be a bigger chunk. This could contribute to some listings feeling stale too as many of these homes have not been updated (something that buyers want today). I suppose I could try to pull all sales from 1998 onward in MLS, but this is a tedious process, so I’m only showing 2012 onward today despite the more limited view (this took hours to pull, by the way).
Takeaways for real estate friends:
Who are the sellers? Who has incentive to sell in today’s market? Think about who you are talking to in your marketing. Who are you targeting? Does that line up with what we’re seeing statistically?
DATA METHODOLOGY:
These stats are based on single family detached listings and pendings in Sacramento, Placer, Yolo, and El Dorado counties as of 9/04/2025 (no condos). I compared all of these properties with the addresses of sales from previous years. I used the “Street Address” field in MLS to sort through properties. At first, I used the “Full Address,” but after all my research I realized not every listing had the full ZIP Code listed in MLS, so results weren’t good enough. So, I exported all data again (over 330,000 sales) with just the street address (no ZIP), and it made a difference. I used Excel to identify duplicates, which showed when a current listing was sold on MLS previously. One limiting factor here is there are some current listings that were purchased privately (not on MLS), and focusing on MLS sales only doesn’t capture those properties. This is true of new construction especially that may not have listed on MLS in previous years. So, if anything, consider these numbers reliable, but conservative too.
Thanks for being here.
LEAVING COMMENTS: The captcha is not working perfectly. If you open up a new browser, that should solve the issue. It’s been a problem to comment when clicking from my weekly email. My apologies.
Questions: What stands out to you about the stats today? Anything to add? I’d love to hear your take.
If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.







Short sales have tripled this year, but what that means is there have been 27 so far in the region compared to 9 last year. We could say that’s a whopping 200% growth, but that sounds sensational – especially when we back up for some context to see how many there were a decade ago. No matter what though, we’ve seen growth, so let’s not ignore a trend. I expect to see more short sales ahead as consumers are dealing with growing debt and delinquencies.































